Reader Digest Version Global

24 Things You Might Be Saying Wrong

The Reader's Digest Version of all those confusing words and seemingly random rules you missed in English class.

By Melissa DeMeo and Paul Silverman from Reader's Digest | September 2010

You never mean: Could care less

You always mean: Couldn’t care less

Why: You want to say you care so little already that you couldn’t possibly care any less. When the Boston Celtics’ Ray Allen said, “God could care less whether I can shoot a jump shot,” we know he meant exactly the opposite because 1) God has other things on his mind, and 2) God is a Knicks fan.

You might say: Mano a mano

You might mean: Man-to-man

Why: You don’t speak Spanish by adding vowels to the end of English words, as a columnist describing father–teenage son relationships seemed to think when he wrote, “Don’t expect long, mano a mano talks.” Mano a mano (literally, “hand to hand”) originated with bullfighting and usually refers to a knock-down, drag-out direct confrontation.

You might say: Less

You might mean: Fewer

Why: In general, use fewer when you’re specifying a number of countable things (“200 words or fewer”); reserve less for a mass (“less than half”). So when you’re composing a tweet, do it in 140 characters or fewer, not less.

You never mean: Hone in

You always mean: Home in

Why: Like homing pigeons, we can be single-minded about finding our way to a point: “Scientists are homing in on the causes of cancer.” Hone means “to sharpen”: “The rookie spent the last three seasons honing his skills in the minor leagues.” But it’s easy to mishear m’s and n’s, which is probably what happened to the Virginia senator who said, “We’ve got to hone in on cost containment.” If you’re unsure, say “zero in” instead.

You might say: Bring

You might mean: Take

Why: The choice depends on your point of view. Use bring when you want to show motion toward you (“Bring the dog treats over here, please”). Use take to show motion in the opposite direction (“I have to take Rufus to the vet”). The rule gets confusing when the movement has nothing to do with you. In those cases, you can use either verb, depending on the context: “The assistant brought the shot to the vet” (the vet’s point of view); “the assistant took the shot to the doctor” (the assistant’s).

Your Comments

  • Ogickas

    You forgot Just can’t when you mean, Can’t just. This one really gets to me.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OPLCUGWQ3HMHZZGJN3CB24DX4U DB Cooper

      exactly!

    • Eyeinthesky

      As in: you can’t just USE INCORRECT GRAMMAR IN THE TITLE OF AN ARTICLE ABOUT THE USE OF BAD GRAMMAR!! Unbelievable. Should be: ‘Saying INCORRECTLY’, not ‘Saying Wrong.’ Sheesh! They pay their copy editors?!

      • Eljahn

         I’m hopeful the title was meant as a joke.

        • http://twitter.com/Mosquera_NL Nance Lee Mosquera

          I expected the article to begin by pointing that out! I hope it was meant to be funny.

          • Grammar Fan

            Yes, “incorrectly” may be preferred, but Merriam-Webster says that “wrong” may be used as an adverb. 

          • Grammar Fan

            Yes, “incorrectly” may be preferred, but Merriam-Webster says that “wrong” may be used as an adverb. 

        • Drs

          Don’t you mean to say “Hopefully, the title was meant as a joke.”?

          • Sylkinner2008

            I hope that was a joke.  Hopefully has been used incorrectly for years.Nance is correct.

        • Drs

          Don’t you mean to say “Hopefully, the title was meant as a joke.”?

      • Eljahn

         I’m hopeful the title was meant as a joke.

      • http://twitter.com/topscientist Top Scientist

        Uh actually, half-wits. “wrong” is perfectly acceptable as an adverb, and the title is fine.

      • nightwriter

         Webster’s New Twentieth Century Dictionary, Unabridged (the bible of dictionaries, and, if you don’t have one, you should get one): wrong, adv., amiss; incorrectly; in a wrong manner, direction, etc. …. In other words, like “fast,” “wrong” can be either an adjective or adverb. I’d suggest you be a bit more careful before blasting someone for using incorrect grammar.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_LIOXBCSJTAYNDAWS2CP3XZLCAA Tony

        Any publication,- from small town fishwrap to major metropolitan newspapers and nationaly distributed magazines, it never fails that I find simple errors that a third grader should be able to spot.

        • dallasclint

          Does finding simple errors make your life happier?

  • Ogickas

    You forgot Just can’t when you mean, Can’t just. This one really gets to me.

  • Nemo

    You also omitted my pet peeve – those who pronounce the word Nuclear, as Nuke-You-ler !
    LOOK at the spelling!   The word does NOT contain the letter ‘U’!

  • Nemo

    You also omitted my pet peeve – those who pronounce the word Nuclear, as Nuke-You-ler !
    LOOK at the spelling!   The word does NOT contain the letter ‘U’!

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1228424775 Kathy Bond

      Uh, yes it does contain a ‘U’…

      • http://www.facebook.com/terrie1958 Terrie Smith Nielsen

        Yes, right after the “N” and nowhere else.  ONE U.  Tell that to my husband.  “NU.” “CLEAR.” As in Nucleus, as in molecules…

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JV34ISDM6JT4HFPR5THWRNSRGI Jeff

      Oops!!  Good idea to read (and comprehend) what you write.

    • Jo Ann aka Grammar Queen

      Ugh, I agree! I’m surprised at how many people mispronounce this word, many of them well-educated. It boggles my mind!

    • Flowrlady1

      The word DOES use a ‘u’ but not the second syllable!

    • Flowrlady1

      The word DOES use a ‘u’ but not the second syllable!

    • Anonymous

       I agree. That sounds like fingernails on a chalk board to me. My response is that if something is difficult to comprehend, does that mean that it’s unkular?

    • Mclean_dm

      I did look at the spelling; “Nuclear” does contain the letter ‘U.’

    • Karri

      U is the second letter!

    • John

      Nemo,
      I think you should check out the second letter of the word nuclear.  It is a u.

    • Astull

       Absolutely does contain a u. But i do feel your pain.

    • Anonymous

      I know!  And don’t you also hate it when people pronounce “colonel” as if it has an “r” in it?

    • dallasclint

      like George Bush.

  • Ak907guy

    If I WERE (or is it if I WAS) … as in, “If I *were* a rich man …” (singing)

    • Anonymous

      “If I were” is correct.

      • MRSCIPPIO

        CONJUGATING THE VERB “TO BE”: I WAS; YOU WERE; HE,SHE OR IT WAS.

        • Anonymous

          Correct, in the indicative mood.  “If I were” is in the subjunctive mood. 

  • Dan Reese

    Ironically, a “related video” below this article is titled “How to Eat Less Calories”.

  • Dan Reese

    In my experience, many use mano a mano correctly (a fist fight).

    • GDJ

      I agree. It means “hand to hand” as in hand to hand combat.

    • nbsp

      Yes, but I frequently see mano y mano or mano e mano which mean hand and hand in Spanish and, I think, Italian.

  • DQUser

    I hate those news reraders on TV who insist on pronouncing “international” as “innernational.”

  • Todd

    Coupon (coo) not Qupon

    • Tanjoniquebs

      I this has a lot to do with dialect and what part of the United States a person is from. Southern people tend to pronounce it as Qupon. I know I do.

      • Ann

         I am from the south. I pronounce it coo-pon. Maybe certain parts of the south pronounce it Qupon. I’m from Mississippi, raised in Florida, and have lived in Texas most of my adult life.

      • Ann

         I am from the south. I pronounce it coo-pon. Maybe certain parts of the south pronounce it Qupon. I’m from Mississippi, raised in Florida, and have lived in Texas most of my adult life.

  • Ewittenb

    I think you mean “saying incorrectly,” not “saying wrong.”

  • Ewittenb

    I think you mean “saying incorrectly,” not “saying wrong.”

    • Keith

      or ‘saying wrongly’. An adverb, not adjective, goes with a verb.

      • Rockfrance

        Well, actually “wrong” is both an adjective and an adverb, according to Cambridge dictionary.

  • GDJ

    Sorry, but above is wrong on more than and over: More indicates quantity. Over indicates location.

    • http://www.facebook.com/terrie1958 Terrie Smith Nielsen

      Of course, then there is Moreover…

  • lisper

    ‘Very unique’.  A thing is either unique or it isn’t, no need to qulify the description.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JV34ISDM6JT4HFPR5THWRNSRGI Jeff

      Excellent!!  An all-too-common earsore.

  • gdj

    Pet Peeve: Wanna-be editors who think it is improper to split an infinitive under any circumstances, when in fact the majority of modern English usage guides have dropped the objection to the split infinitive. So to them I say to boldly go where most grammar authorities have gone…..and get over it, fecause when you insist on never splitting an infinitive, you end up sounding like some rigid, pretentious English snob from the 19th century.

    • nbsp

      Yes, I have finally been dragged kicking and screaming to the realization that English is always evolving.  At 60, I am learning to be flexible.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/TQHW7IVS6S7YD5S4SSPRYBW3UE Pontefractious

      I accept that split infinitives should no longer be considered to be incorrect. Nevertheless, they  sound awkward to me and I am reluctant to split infinitives myself. I do not think this makes me a rigid pretentious English snob from the 19th century. 
      In the same vein, I no longer inveigh against those who use the recently (c 1976) invented “centennial” as in “bicentennial”. Centenary and bicentenary, which have been in the language for about 400 years, which are used in the UK, and which were in general use in the United States until the bicentenary of the War of Independence, seem adequate to me, but no-one can stand in the way of linguistic developments.

  • D2e2z2d

    I hate these Grammar Nazis, they forget about regional variations and believe the world needs to follow their parochial orthodoxy.

    • Tanjoniquebs

      So true on the regional variations.

    • Lusephir

      I agree with this point in abstract. I speak using different accents because I was raised in theater but some people really don’t know how strange an accent can sound to one who may be foreign to the region of it’s origin.

      While I will agree that the preservation of the patriotically orthodoxy may seem oppressing and threatening know this: That simply the English Language is composed of standards and rules that must be strictly observed and adhered to in their truest form.

      However, no one ever said the Nazis had to wipe everyone else out.

      With greatest respect to the colorful and charming nature of your regional variations!

      • Chrisshaner

         Your use of “region of it’s (sic) origin”  contains a misspelling of its.

    • Mark Jackson

      Comma splice!

  • Carolyn Larson

    What about the improper use of “I?”. So often used in place of “me.”

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mark-Hillyard/100000971153370 Mark Hillyard

      I and my wife would like to agree to disagree!

      • Mbrumble

        How about My wife and I …

  • Tanjoniquebs

    This article is stupid and I could care less. Is this writer an English major. If not, he/she does not have the authority to tell people what they are saying wrong.

    • DeClerq

      You COULDN’T car less.  Did you not read the article?

    • Spotdog19

      Are YOU an english major? If not, you don’t have the authority to tell others that they don’t have the authority to tell others they are wrong.  You probably won’t understand that…

      • Lizochka65

        No one receives an “authority badge” to correct others, and–believe it or not–some non-majors even know English rules! It’s a disconcerting sign of the times that too many people can’t use English properly.  I majored in two foreign languages but I most definitely know my mother tongue well enough to spot glaring errors.  

    • Mark Jackson

      Your second sentence should probably have a question mark, not a period.

  • Tallen1120

    People, mostly teens, can’t make a sentence without using “like”. I’m like…its like…shes like…
    You sound  as if you are from the west coast.  Nothing is “like”…it either is or it isn’t.  Even  supposedly educated adults are running it into the ground.  Ignorance runs rampant.

  • Tallen1120

    People, mostly teens, can’t make a sentence without using “like”. I’m like…its like…shes like…
    You sound  as if you are from the west coast.  Nothing is “like”…it either is or it isn’t.  Even  supposedly educated adults are running it into the ground.  Ignorance runs rampant.

  • Tallen1120

    People, mostly teens, can’t make a sentence without using “like”. I’m like…its like…shes like…
    You sound  as if you are from the west coast.  Nothing is “like”…it either is or it isn’t.  Even  supposedly educated adults are running it into the ground.  Ignorance runs rampant.

  • Aimeecowan

    Once I get started, I could write a book on this subject. Things like “could care less”, “anyways”, and that one where people double the “is”, can’t think of an example right now, are like fingernails on a chalkboard to my ear. Another one: “alls it is is”, or “alls I’m saying is”. People get offended if you correct them in any way, but I would welcome being informed if I’m saying something grammatically incorrect. There are ways to correct, but most people don’t want to think about speech before speaking. My own mother carries a grudge for decades when her ignorance is gently informed. I admit to being embarrassed when my children and grands laugh at some old-fashioned or regional speech patterns I use, and some I won’t change because it boils down to tomato-tomato ? thinking. But when it’s something that is saying the opposite of what we mean, we need to reconsider, at least. 

    • Csimpson74

      Oh, I hate the double “is”.  I know exactly what you’re talking about and I’m making it my mission to come back here with an example.  Isn’t it funny how none comes to mind when you need it?  (None = Not one.  Singular, right?)

    • Csimpson74

      Oh, I hate the double “is”.  I know exactly what you’re talking about and I’m making it my mission to come back here with an example.  Isn’t it funny how none comes to mind when you need it?  (None = Not one.  Singular, right?)

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JV34ISDM6JT4HFPR5THWRNSRGI Jeff

    Or my personal favorite:  a ‘left- (or -right) hand turn.’  Turns, of course, don’t have hands.  You mean to say a ‘left (or right) turn.’  Or lane, or side…. well, you get the idea.

  • Liquid_schwartz

    irregardless – adding a negating prefix to a word does not give it emphasis, it makes sound like a fool.
    pet peeve – if something peeves you don’t keep it as a pet

    • http://www.facebook.com/terrie1958 Terrie Smith Nielsen

      Agreed on the irregardless.  On the other hand, many of us DO nurse peeves, grudges and the like as if they WERE pets.

  • SomeGuy

    Ensure: taking action so something will happen.

    Insure: taking out a policy

  • Sched1

    They missed:

    You never mean:  chomping at the bit
    You always mean:  champing at the bit

  • http://twitter.com/PastorJasonGant Pastor Jason Gant

    There are actually 25 things, not 24. The title of the above article “24 Things You Might Be Saying Wrong” is, in itself, incorrect. “Wrong” is an adjective, as in “He’s the wrong man.” Hence, the ADVERB should be used here, making the correct statement to be “24 Things You Might Be Saying Wrongly.”  I guess the authors behaved badly!

    • Rockfrance

      Well, if you have an English grammar or a dictionary, check it out and you’ll see that the word “wrong” is both and adjective and an adverb.  The authors can be bad at maths, but there is no grammar mistake.

  • Kaliphoenix

    Some have said we need to consider regional variations when dealing with pronunciation.  No, we don’t.  People pronounce words correctly or they don’t.  People use proper grammar or they don’t.

    I listen to audiobooks and notice that the number of narrators who pronounce words incorrectly in increasing.

    • Barone

      You are wrong. Pronunciations vary by region. So do words themselves. Go to England and “orientate” yourself.  Have some PE-can pie in Georgia and some chocolate “pe-CAN” ice cream in Ohio. Just because somebody does not pronounce a word the way you were taught does not make them wrong. 

      • Plwww

        Indeed. Language isn’t fixed, but extremely dynamic. The pronunciation and meaning of words shift constantly over time. New words are created and old ones effectively die from disuse. The best we can say for correctness is, “this is the most common usage”. Oddly enough, it is the acknowledgement of this dynamic nature of language that makes me appreciate a thoughtful adherence to common standards: I hate the idea that, “This was like, so awesome” may someday be considered “correct”.

      • Lilly Munster

        No, you are only describing “speech impediments.”  The rules and pronunciations do not change just because you live near a lot of illiterate people.  There is no “orientate,” unless you didn’t pay attention.   As for PEcan,  it’s from the south,  where the accents are from mush-mouthed laziness and lack of education.    That is precisely why major universities have
        “remedial English” for those who had a bad education in English, or grew up in the south.
        You will not be employed in a Fortune 500 company if you sound “suthren.”

  • Gunther

    This is one anal retentive author here. I couldn’t care less how people use these cliches….

  • Rainbow Writer75

    My biggest pet peeve is “irregardless”. IRREGARDLESS IS NOT A WORD! The word is just simply, “regardless”. I’ve heard countless people use this and it drives me crazy every time. Especially when it’s a college professor or a teacher.

  • http://www.facebook.com/terrie1958 Terrie Smith Nielsen

    I’ve noticed recently that there are too many people using the work “peak” when they mean “peek.”  I’ve seen lots of references to “sneak peaks” relating to movies, gifts and the like.  “Peak” refers to the top of something, such as a mountain or a career path.  “Peek” refers to looking briefly, as in “peekaboo.”

    • Karl Bring

      So, you’re piqued.

  • Darcismckid

    they missed my biggest pet peeve – The Phrase “these ones”…  As in “I want these ones here to be taken over there.”  its redundant….  These is sufficient… there is no need for “ones” to be added!

  • Darcismckid

    they missed my biggest pet peeve – The Phrase “these ones”…  As in “I want these ones here to be taken over there.”  its redundant….  These is sufficient… there is no need for “ones” to be added!

  • Bob

    I’m from Ohio and I want to clearifiy the comment about pecans.  In refering to the nut, the proper pronounication is pe-con.  A pee-can is what we use on the boat to relieve ourselves.

  • Dumdum

    ‘vehicle’ is one of my “nails across a blackboard” .personal preference is vee-i-kl.  not vee-hi-kl.

  • tashacakes

    Here are several grammatical faux pas that I find a little annoying, mostly because they tend to make people sound uneducated.
    … using a preposition to end a sentence.
    “Let’s find out where we’re at.” ["Let's find out where we are."]
    … using a plural attributive adjective when gender is unknown.
    “Someone left their dog in the car.”
    ["Someone left his or her dog in the car."]
    … the completely inexplicible pluralization of something that can’t possibly be plural.
    “This is your book. I’ve got mines.”

    • GrammarJew

      I’m sorry, but “Someone left his or her dog in the car” sounds ridiculous. As long as he or she (see?) doesn’t spell it “they’re”, I’m not going to complain.

      • tashacakes

        I think, “he or she” sounds correct, not ridiculous. However, I appreciate your opinion.

        • Sylskinner2008

          ‘His or her’ is correct, their is plural, and should not be used to indicate one person.. 

      • SDA Doug

        Since the ownership of the dog is in question why not say “Someone left a dog in the car”?

  • Guest

    It’s actually culs-de-sac, NOT cul-de-sacs.  It works the same as brothers-in-law.

  • Lizochka65

    their/there/they’re; to/too; its/it’s, apostrophes where they don’t belong, not using an object after a preposition (between him and me, not between he and I), starting a sentence with “Me and him…” and a few others, like “could of” and “minus well” (might as well)… English can be such a beautiful language when it’s used correctly!

  • Anonymous

    Yes or no are always a better choice than absolutely.

  • Anonymous

    Oh, yes – it’s not k’laaa’meh’duh, it’s kil’o'meter.

    • Csimpson74

      According to McMillan and American Heritage dictionaries, there is no long “o” in kilometer and the emphasis is on the second syllable.  Just sayin’.

  • Irene Graham

    HOW TO RESPOND TO “HOW ARE YOU?”

  • Battyham45

    My favorite — Say “J C Penney”, not “J C Penny”.  Excuse me.  I write those, not say those.  When spoken, who can tell how it is spelled.

  • Battyham45

    My favorite — Say “J C Penney”, not “J C Penny”.  Excuse me.  I write those, not say those.  When spoken, who can tell how it is spelled.

  • Guest

    Love this! another pet peeve of mine is is the use of Historical when theny mean historic.  Current events (the election and inauguration of Pres. Obama, The capture of Bin Laden, etc) are not Historical, they are historic…

    Historic: 
    Famous or important in history, or potentially so

    Historical : 
    Of or concerning history; concerning past events.Belonging to the past, not the present.

  • Tommyniles

    I might have titled this article “24 Things One Might Be Saying Wrongly”.

    -Ivy League a-hole
    @martykayzee:disqus 

  • Tommyniles

    I might have titled this article “24 Things One Might Be Saying Wrongly”.

    -Ivy League a-hole
    @martykayzee:disqus 

  • Matt Hammond

    And also,

    - “Ain’t Nothing”
    - “Those Ones”

    • Sylskinner2008

      ‘Ain’t Nothing” is, of course, incorrect, but ‘ain’t’ is often used as slang for emphasis, by people who usually speak correctly.

  • Griffin01

    I hate it when people pronounce “especially” as “ek-specially”. 

    • Dan

      What about when people say “just between you and I”. I hear this all the time on TV and movies. Using the nominative case after a prepositions is a no-no. It is such a give-away that the person using such as “she gave Bob and I a lecture on etiquette”.

      • Dan

        correction – preposition – sorry should have proofed it before posting

        • http://twitter.com/kokuaguy Michael Salling

          always …

      • Dan

        correction – preposition – sorry should have proofed it before posting

      • Dan

        correction – preposition – sorry should have proofed it before posting

    • Dan

      What about when people say “just between you and I”. I hear this all the time on TV and movies. Using the nominative case after a prepositions is a no-no. It is such a give-away that the person using such as “she gave Bob and I a lecture on etiquette”.

    • Dan

      What about when people say “just between you and I”. I hear this all the time on TV and movies. Using the nominative case after a prepositions is a no-no. It is such a give-away that the person using such as “she gave Bob and I a lecture on etiquette”.

    • Dan

      What about when people say “just between you and I”. I hear this all the time on TV and movies. Using the nominative case after a prepositions is a no-no. It is such a give-away that the person using such as “she gave Bob and I a lecture on etiquette”.

  • Arizzo313

    News reporters have replaced yes and no to a question with absolutely. Also, it appears that sunk has replaced sank in many articles and newscasts. “The ship sunk off the coast yesterday.” What’s going on? However, in day-to-day speech, it often sounds pretentious to end a sentence correctly by using “I” rather than “me.”

    • Ann

      Arizzo313, it depends on the sentence. Correct: “You are more talented than I” (am is understood). Incorrect: “They gave a party for Dan and I” (should be me). It’s true that the first sentence, which correctly ends with “I,” is correct, but sounds pretentious. Because of that, I usually add the understood “am.”

  • Okello

    ‘None of us here is perfect’ NOT ‘None of us here are perfect’ . I feel saddened that an African like me  had to correct a Stanford English graduate!

    • Rockfrance

      Grow up, buddy!

    • Rockfrance

      Grow up, buddy!

  • Anonymous

    I suggest we all defer to the wisdom of Norm Crosby and Yogi Berra for these matters. 

  • Iheartjuliephan

    But…the plural of “cul-de-sac” IS “culS-de-sac, so it isn’t an exception to that rule. Thanks, Gilmore Girls, for teaching me that!

  • Bnana3

    Jewelry– not jewl-ery
    Realtor–not real-a-tor
    Realty—not real-a-ty

  • DD

    My pet peeve is “irregardless” when they really mean “regardless”

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000117739822 Daniel Przybylski

    “Any more questions for Judi or I?”..

    It drives me nuts when people choose the case of their pronouns based on nothing more than “what sounds right”.

  • Carissa Enteria

    very helpful for a second language teacher like me..thanks so much!

  • Jo Ann

    Finally! I’m so glad I’m not the only person on the planet that still notices these things. For a while, I was worried that no one cared anymore!

    • Lilly Munster

      No…you are not the only person on the planet WHO still notices these things.  You are a WHO, not a THAT. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=807660441 Dan Livermore

    Please stop saying (for-tay) when you mean (fort). Yes, they are both spelled “forte”, but they are not the same word. (Fort) is a personal strength, (For-tay) is a musical term. 

    Also, the correct phrase is “old stamping grounds” (as in the area of grass stamped down by animal hooves). You’re wrong if you say “old stomping grounds.”

    Just because “everyone uses it that way” doesn’t make it right. Common usage be damned, rules is rules. 

  • Flowrlady1

    I sincerely hope this is read by everyone.  There is a LOT of confusion out there and I am so tired of having my attention diverted from the real point of the conversation to a point of grammar

  • verderf

    In the example “the money that is on the table”  sounds much better when we drop ‘that is’ and simply say, “The money on the table is yours.”

  • verderf

    In the example “the money that is on the table”  sounds much better when we drop ‘that is’ and simply say, “The money on the table is yours.”

  • no worries

    All of a sudden, or all of the sudden???

  • Slarsrules

    Holes in one?  So, if I get three holes in one, that would imply that I swung once, and got my ball in three holes.  Perhaps you mean, three hole-in-ones, which would indicate that a “hole-in-one” is a discrete thing, of which there can be more than one, as opposed to holes, which are multiple, and one, which is singular.

  • Linda Lawton

    The one that really gets me is ‘these ones’ when you should just say ‘these’.

  • samirmondle

    Since my boyhood I have been learning from Reader’s Digest.  How could I ever forget:  Quotable Quotes, and so many other words of wisdom.  Bravi!! Please keep up the wonderful work.  My sincere thanks and gratitude……Samir, NY

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_US4QTW6SLOXQCGOYANKKFBGR7E Paul

    I myself (me myself)

  • sokkergrl

    How about irregardless…hear this all the time…regardless of how incorrect it is!

  • Boogywstew

    It’s amazing how many people want to spend time on a “desert” island instead of a deserted island.

  • Anonymous

    Don’t forget the confusion between there, their and they’re, as well as to, too and two. 

  • Suudo_nim

    INCORRECTLY!!!!

  • Suudo_nim

    INCORRECTLY!!!!

  • Asdf

    Uhh, how about the title?  It should read “24 Things You Might Be Saying WrongLY”  or “…Incorrectly” as someone else suggested.

    You guys should have covered this common error, where folks drop the “-ly” when saying things like “This article was written perfect.”

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jared-Lewis/524912918 Jared Lewis

    Its funny when someone tries to say that the others use of language is incorrect. Language evolves over time, and these self limiting rules are only built to make some people feel superior to others. Your systems of control get old to those who see through them.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jared-Lewis/524912918 Jared Lewis

    Its funny when someone tries to say that the others use of language is incorrect. Language evolves over time, and these self limiting rules are only built to make some people feel superior to others. Your systems of control get old to those who see through them.

  • Anonymous

    Re the article by Melissa DeMeo and Paul Silverman from Reader’s Digest | September 2010.

    24 Things You Might Be Saying Wrong.
     Did you mean to say:”24 things you might be saying wrongly”?  (adverb)

      I was also very disappointed to not see you  include the commonly misused words:  there, their, they’re.  Just a glance at professionally written articles every day in the media will show the misuse of these words.

  • Jovanna

    What about the biggie that I almost never hear said correctly, the phrase,  ”in vogue”…it’s redundant…  “vogue” mean “in fashion.”  So if you’re saying “The dress is in vogue”…you’re really saying: “The dress is IN IN fashion.”  It should be said:  The dress is vogue.

  • Anonymous

    Zackly, meaning his breath smells zackly like his bum! Example:  Obummy has a case of the zacklies!

  • Laurevincent

    I can’t believe it. Nobody mentioned my pet peeve. It is so widespread, I see it online daily. Many people use the word “of” instead of “have”. I think it comes from hearing the contractions could’ve, should’ve, would’ve, etc. It sounds like “could of” instead of “could have”, which is what the contraction means. I’ve seen this in otherwise well written pieces.

    • Jonathan

      This irks me to no end as well! I hate when people do this.

      I actually commented on this exact mistake before seeing your comment on it. I’m glad I’m not the only one that’s noticed this.

  • Me

    How about the difference between “between” and “among?”  Or “different than” (comparative), not “different from?”

  • Keng

    I receive telephone solicitation calls in which the caller wants to “ax” me a question. No sale, dumbo.

  • Jameshcarlson

    Don’t you mean “wrongly”?

  • Anonymous

    I axed. cracks me up every time.

  • Teddyjackeddy

    Ax
    Ash
    Ask
    Yo dog let me ax you a question. Hey, let me ash you something.
    What you really mean to say is, hey may I ask you sumpin?

  • Jcn

    Unsurprisingly, the very title of this grammar tutorial contains the common grammatical error of confusing “may” with “might”. Usually the error is in the opposite direction, though. Dear Melissa and Paul, “might” is used in a hypothetical construction OR as the past form of “may”, neither of which is happening here.

  • Whatever

    Wow… irony… how about trying one of these – “24 Things You Might be Saying Incorrectly/Wrongly” or “24 Things You Might be Saying in a Manner that is Wrong”

  • Carl nelsen

    things you might be saying “wrong” or do you mean wrongly

  • Anonymous

    Also, “irregardless”…instead of “regardless.”

  • Krankankor

    ‘More than’ and ‘Over’ should not be used interchangeably. Over is a position as is under or beside. More than is a numerical expression used when quantities are being discussed.

    He threw his hat OVER the fence which was MORE THAN hundreds on the ground.

  • Shelbihaught

    My pet peeve:  eager and anxious.  “I am anxious to see my boyfriend tonight.  We will have so much fun!”  Don’t you mean that you are “eager” to see your boyfriend?  Why would you be “nervous” “anxious” to see your boyfriend?  Wouldn’t you be “eager” “excited” to see him?

  • Alice_E

    Whom is an obsolete word. 

    • Anonymous

      From whom did you hear this?

  • Gducote

    Asking a question: Where is it at?   You don’t need to add the word at.
    Correct: Where is it?

    • Perniciouskitty

       ”Prolly” or “probly” instead of “probably”, “joo-lery” instead of “joo-well-ry”, “tempachur” instead of “temperature”. One of my favorite ways to confuse a child is the old “yes you can, but you may not” game.

       Also, if ignorance of proper use of language renders it obsolete, I give up.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/YN6JPJTGLW2OBFSAUKFJ363S3I turq

    To persuade or convince..those two always got me.

  • Anonymous

    More supposed “words”, misused and mispronounced words I hear  a lot.

    -kindergarden instead of kindergarten
    -liberry instead of library
    -spinage instead of spinach
    -Walmark instead of Walmart
    -then instead of than.  More then words…

    Saying you have a temperature, when you mean fever or elevated temperature..  Everyone has a temperature.

    -whole entire. As in: “I think this is the whole entire list”.  There are alot more… but I think I will end with that misspelling of a lot.  

    • Kirby8985

      a lot

    • Kirby8985

      a lot

  • coolhead

    Language is merely consensus, people.  The English spoken five hundred years ago sounds almost nothing like what we speak today because all of the mispronunciations, foreign influences, and all the other factors that influence language became so pervasive that they unavoidably went from being regarded as vulgar or incorrect to becoming a legitimate part of the language.  I’d so love to hear how English sounds five hundred years from now!

  • A Good Broad

    Their There They’re   These are usually used inproperly.

    • Kay Lowe

      As is “you’re” and “your”. Constantly misused.

    • Kay Lowe

      As is “you’re” and “your”. Constantly misused.

  • Kay Lowe

    Some of my pet peeves are using “would have” instead of “had”. I don’t know the grammatical rules, but I cringe when I hear people say things like, “If he would have listened to the directions…”, instead of, “If he had listened to the directions..”. Or, “If I would have known you were coming, I’d have baked a cake”, instead of “If I HAD known that you were coming, I would have baked a cake.”

  • Kay Lowe

    Some of my pet peeves are using “would have” instead of “had”. I don’t know the grammatical rules, but I cringe when I hear people say things like, “If he would have listened to the directions…”, instead of, “If he had listened to the directions..”. Or, “If I would have known you were coming, I’d have baked a cake”, instead of “If I HAD known that you were coming, I would have baked a cake.”

  • Tightroper

    So like she goes, “What’s your problem?”  And I’m like, “None uh your business.”

  • Becky

     They forgot two of my biggest irritations–when someone says “invested” when they mean “vested” as in “By the power VESTED in me, I now pronounce you man & wife”, but instead I repeatedly hear people use the word ‘invested’ instead.  Another one is “Butt naked”.  No, it’s BUCK naked.

  • Ryan M

    “Very unique”

    There are no levels of “uniqueness”.  You would never say, “that trinket is very one-of-a-kind.”

  • http://twitter.com/jackitweets JACQUELINE LIPPMAN

    Hilarious vs hysterical.

  • http://twitter.com/jackitweets JACQUELINE LIPPMAN

    Hilarious vs hysterical.

  • Anonymous

    After reading this, I am going to drive on the parkway until I get home to park in the driveway.

  • Marlowe01267

    You might say “24 Things You might Say Wrong”.
    Interestingly enough, the headline of your article contains the very kind of errors you go on to correct.You should say:  ”24 Things You might Say Incorrectly”.

  • CBDemartini

    You mean ‘ say incorrectly’? 
     

  • Tampa Bay Ted

     I want to throw my telescope at the science documentaries on tv that continually use further instead of farther for distance…Saturn is FARTHER from Earth than Mars. The Brits use further for distance all the time, so it may be a regionalism on their part. However, Americans have no such excuse. Then there’s discrete and discreet. It’s a DISCREET encounter. Discrete means a fine gradation Arghhhhh! And then there are the folks that use an apostrophe and the plural s…toy’s for sale, boy’s and girl’s dance.

  • Tampa Bay Ted

     I want to throw my telescope at the science documentaries on tv that continually use further instead of farther for distance…Saturn is FARTHER from Earth than Mars. The Brits use further for distance all the time, so it may be a regionalism on their part. However, Americans have no such excuse. Then there’s discrete and discreet. It’s a DISCREET encounter. Discrete means a fine gradation Arghhhhh! And then there are the folks that use an apostrophe and the plural s…toy’s for sale, boy’s and girl’s dance.

  • Windspiele

    Texet-ed…I never text Ed.
    At about…it’s either at 8 o’clock or about 8 o’clock but will never be both.

  • Windspiele

    I work at grammar but my spelling sux.

  • Sylskinner2008

    I’m glad somebody still knows difference between ‘bring and take” I wish we could stop using ‘convince’ when we mean ‘persuade, ‘fault’ when we mean ‘blame’ and most of all ’ I” when we mean ‘me”  Ogickas, a similiar one that gets to me is “What are you still doing here?’  Should be “What are you doing, still here?’ Or better, ‘ Why are you still here?”

  • Lynzbyz

    What about exspecially (not a word?) vs. especially?  or Irregardless (not a word?) vs. Regardless?  Orientate vs. orient (verb)?

  • Sobreea

    Where I live, we don’t use whom.  Everybody uses ‘who’ like ‘whom’ doesn’t exist. 

    I know one guy that says ‘whom’, and when he does, it sounds weird. 

    • Squiddy

       Weird does not mean incorrect.

  • http://www.cowboyjedi.com/ Grambler

    At risk of embarrassing myself, I don’t understand this pun: : “The charge that over is inferior to more than is a baseless crotchet.”

  • http://www.cowboyjedi.com/ Grambler

    When invited to a function such as a party, though, is the point of view the location of the function?  In other words, “I’ll bring dessert,” or, “Shall I bring the wine?”

  • http://www.cowboyjedi.com/ Grambler

    For future lists, two commonly misused words: hopefully and literally.

  • Albee1956

    You never mean: Could care less
    You always mean: Couldn’t care less—I disagree.
    Could care less is correct also.  It is said sarcastically, such as, ” I could care less what you think!”
    with emphasis on ‘less’, meaning that you really could NOT care less.

  • Joee

    You forgot you’re vs. your. Many people type your when they mean you’re

  • Mike

    Also, one does not graduate high school; ond graduates from high school.

  • guest

    “Alternate” and “alternative” as a confusing pair.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1187520448 Luke O’Neal

    how about when people in kansas say something like, “I need to drive up to texas ” or “i need to drive down to nebraska”  . thats bugs me like crazy. If you are headed to the south, you should say “down” and if you are headed to the north, you should say “up” .

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1017580221 Dave Rhoads

    But when you are composing a tweet in 140 characters (fewer/less) less IS fewer!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000026718729 Doug Becker

    Most people make this mistake… You do not “MAKE” a decision. But rather, you “TAKE” one.

    • Ann

       I may be wrong, but where I come from, you’re making a mistake on that one. Why would you “make a mistake,” but “take a decision”? This is probably an example of a regionalism; are you from England or some other country than the United States? I’ve never heard an American speak of “taking” a decision.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000026718729 Doug Becker

        I live in Alaska, still a  part of the United States. ‘Decision’ is a word which comes from middle- French which means “to cut off”. Taking a decision is “choosing between” 2 or more options, nothing is ‘made’. 
        So, you can “form an opinion” leading you to “take a decision” and hope you do not “make a mistake” in so doing. 

    • Ann

       I may be wrong, but where I come from, you’re making a mistake on that one. Why would you “make a mistake,” but “take a decision”? This is probably an example of a regionalism; are you from England or some other country than the United States? I’ve never heard an American speak of “taking” a decision.

    • Ann

       I may be wrong, but where I come from, you’re making a mistake on that one. Why would you “make a mistake,” but “take a decision”? This is probably an example of a regionalism; are you from England or some other country than the United States? I’ve never heard an American speak of “taking” a decision.

  • E.A. Blair

    You never need to say “reason why”;  the “why” is unnecessary unless you’re reciting Tennyson, in which case, “reason” is a verb, not a noun.

  • Platitudinous Fresco

    Please spread the word regarding “laxadaisical.” 
    People have grown so lackadaisical with the misuse of that word that it’s now reached the point of 50-50 use/misuse…at best!

  • Bill Fisher

    Let’s not forget “meteoric rise.”  Meteors FALL.

  • Mtkelley

    The absolute worst is when people say ‘if I would have (known, gone, done, etc., etc.)  It is so awful – the correct grammar is ‘If I HAD KNOWN, or HAD GONE or HAD SEEN, etc.  PLEASE pay attention!  This is so improper and it is lazy!!!!

  • David Doucet

    I expected the article to have more humor.  But, irregardless, it was informative!
    I’ll leave it up to all as to which word creates a sensation similar to running your fingernails down a blackboard!

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/TQHW7IVS6S7YD5S4SSPRYBW3UE Pontefractious

    It particularly irritates me to hear the word “reticent” used when the speaker really means “reluctant.” The two words are not synonyms. “Reticent” means reluctant to speak, as in “the politician was reticent about his recent love affair with his secretary.” You should not say “the boy was reticent about going to school” if what you really mean is “the boy was reluctant to go to school.” 

  • EarlGrayHot

    It makes me nutty to read “should of” instead of “should have.”

  • EarlGrayHot

    It makes me nutty to read “should of” instead of “should have.”

  • Editor/Momof3

    Since we’re on the subject, can we add that “irregardless” is not a word?

  • Editor/Momof3

    Since we’re on the subject, can we add that “irregardless” is not a word?

  • Dave

    “These ones”, when “these” is all you need.  ”On accident” instead of “by accident”.  And, of course, “a whole nother”, which is now either written into scripts or not caught by the director!

  • Dave

    “These ones”, when “these” is all you need.  ”On accident” instead of “by accident”.  And, of course, “a whole nother”, which is now either written into scripts or not caught by the director!

  • Dave

    “These ones”, when “these” is all you need.  ”On accident” instead of “by accident”.  And, of course, “a whole nother”, which is now either written into scripts or not caught by the director!

  • Dave

    “These ones”, when “these” is all you need.  ”On accident” instead of “by accident”.  And, of course, “a whole nother”, which is now either written into scripts or not caught by the director!

  • Nana

    “24 Things you might be saying wrong” is the best I have seen in a long time.  News, sportscasters and others in the media would do well to read and heed these rules of the language.  

  • Tjesster

    Umm, when I say “mano a mano”, I figuratively mean just that–that we are going to go toe to toe, hand to hand in battle over an issue. 

  • Tjesster

    “Begs the question” is not about a circular argument.  It is used to point out a flaw in an argument or train of thought.  “Begs the question” means that the flaw in the argument practically “begs” to be solved.  Sheesh.

  • Liz

    Um, hello.  Mano a mano means hand to hand, not man to man.

  • Liz

    Um, hello.  Mano a mano means hand to hand, not man to man.

  • Teddyparker

    Here’s a popular one; I have to ” take a sh*t”

  • Renee Sousa

    The phrase that gets on my nerves is ” Back in the day”.  What day?  In the last day?!?  In the previous day?!?  The prehistoric day?!?  Which day?!?

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/OAQ4XASGIPFIW3HP5NLBPRZAE4 eric z

    “The three presenters argued with one another over who should announce the award, but Ann and Barbara gave each other flowers after the ceremony.” — Shouldn’t you have used “whom”?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000026718729 Doug Becker

    How about Redundancies?

    “In one hour’s time”, rather than “in one hour”; an hour is a measurement of time and nothing else.
    Let’s look into his “past history”; All ‘history’ is in the ‘past’

    • Csimpson74

      These embellishments grate on me.  And to show what a curmudgeon I am, “in my opinion” is overused.  In fact, exactly when is it useful?

      On a bad day, I’d even like to eliminate the expressions “obviously” and “no offense, but”.  Both say, “get ready to be insulted!”  But I digress.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000026718729 Doug Becker

    Here is another one that I always notice: “comprised of” rather than “comprises” or “composed of”

  • ted

    wish you had mentioned the most egregious error of the word “myself” when “me” should be used.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000026718729 Doug Becker

      Or how about… 
      I, myself prefer the other one. 

  • Anonymous

    Here’s one I see written a lot: should of… Please people, it’s “should have.”

  • Anonymous

    Is “preliminarily” a word?  Or should we use the word “preliminary” in the phrase.  I guess the same question could be asked of “momentarily” and “momentary”.

  • KV

    I’m glad to see a list that mentions the “hone in” abomination. My beef with it is that it doesn’t make any sense. “To home in on a beacon” makes sense, and so does “home in on a specific topic” — the phrase evokes a specific image. But anyone who knows what it means to hone a knife also knows there’s no way to “hone in on” a knife or anything else. 

  • KV

    I’m glad to see a list that mentions the “hone in” abomination. My beef with it is that it doesn’t make any sense. “To home in on a beacon” makes sense, and so does “home in on a specific topic” — the phrase evokes a specific image. But anyone who knows what it means to hone a knife also knows there’s no way to “hone in on” a knife or anything else. 

  • KV

    I’m glad to see a list that mentions the “hone in” abomination. My beef with it is that it doesn’t make any sense. “To home in on a beacon” makes sense, and so does “home in on a specific topic” — the phrase evokes a specific image. But anyone who knows what it means to hone a knife also knows there’s no way to “hone in on” a knife or anything else. 

  • Darstep1

    …bi-annual and semi-annual…
    bi-annual is every two years
    semi-annual is twice a year

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1075470008 Bronson Kyle

    Why isn’t welp listed. That word drives me insane. IT’S ‘WELL’ PEOPLE

  • Csimpson74

    Relatively new pronunciations that I hope don’t “take”:

    coo-unt (couldn’t)
    di-unt (didn’t)

  • Plop plop

    A lot of people write “should of” instead of “should’ve”.

  • Plop plop

    A lot of people write “should of” instead of “should’ve”.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000026718729 Doug Becker

    Here is one I heard on the national news today: “at this point in time”. 
    Can we just say “at this time” or “at this point”

  • Martinm31

    Actually there’s nothing wrong with “wrong.”  ”Wrong” can be an adverb or an adjective.  In the title, it’s being used as an adverb and is modifying the action of “saying.”  ”Incorrectly” would also be fine.  

  • Kenneth Silva

    Since we’re on the subject, here are my current pet peeves: If the personal pronoun you want to use, the poor apostrophe do not abuse. (Its vs. it’s.) There is no construction: America’s Got Talent or You’ve Got Mail. It’s America Has Talent and You Have Mail. (This one’s for you, Mrs. Helen Detsch, high school English teacher.) And finally, couple is not an adjective, it’s a noun. (I have a couple examples vs. I have a couple of examples. Do you remember the object of a preposition? Presently, I’ll post more. Currently means now, and presently means a little bit in the future. 

  • ed
  • http://www.hitherandyon.com/ Colin

    Funny title, great list!

  • teacher

     Where’s it at?

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000026718729 Doug Becker

      Behind the “at”!

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000026718729 Doug Becker

      Behind the “at”!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000026718729 Doug Becker

    “Past History” Isn’t all history in the past? 

  • Noneya

    Add “wrong” from your article title. It should be “incorrectly.”

  • Pokerpoodle

    You hear this all the time, but if the word “myself” is used, there must be a refering pronoun. It is okay to say,  “I, myself, believe in ghosts.”  It in not okay to say, “Sue and myself believe in ghosts.”

  • Pokerpoodle

    You hear this all the time, but if the word “myself” is used, there must be a refering pronoun. It is okay to say,  “I, myself, believe in ghosts.”  It in not okay to say, “Sue and myself believe in ghosts.”

  • guest

    Is the title “wrong”?  The dictionary says “wrong” is an adjective, an adverb, a noun and a transitive verb.  So might the adverb “wrong” modify the verb “be saying”.

    Let’s here from a grammar teacher.

  • guest

    Edit:  

    So might not the adverb “wrong” modify the verb “be saying”?

    (And of course I meant “hear”).

  • Daniel B

    The ‘s’ going in the middle of dashed phrases is silly because a “brother-in-law” is one complete concept that is being pluralized.  Each other / one another is really silly because it’s just “tradition”, not a real rule (much like not ending sentences with prepositions).

  • Michael

    One of the most misused expressions is “just between you and I…”. The easy rule of thumb is to reverse the person, to instantly recognize the mistake. “Between I and you” sounds wrong. The proper way is “between you and me” because…”between me and you” still sounds correct!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1242055817 Karen Johnston

    you never mean:  phrases you might be saying wrong

    you always mean:  phrases you might be saying incorrectly   

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1242055817 Karen Johnston

    you never mean:  phrases you might be saying wrong

    you always mean:  phrases you might be saying incorrectly   

  • Rupok98

    This is nice logical article but there are more options then 24 ways …

  • http://www.facebook.com/judy.bond.77 Judy Bond

    Why is this article catagorized as relationship advice? [See above title]

  • Awentzel

    Most people have totally distorted the Queens English. It is such a shame and makes me cringe. I automatically jump in to correct them but that is bad manners. It is hard to accept so have learned to keep my mouth closed and just smile.

    • Doug

      I’m sorry, did you mean the “Queen’s English” or the “Queens English” as written?

  • Squirrel Girl

    My pet peeve is: I’m done”.  People are finished, cakes are done.

  • Lucka

    Actually, “mano a mano” is completely correct in Brazilian Portuguese and it has the same meaning as “man-to-man”.

  • Eddie

    Your headline should have been “24 things you might be saying wrongly”.  Saying is a verb and “wrongly” is the adverb that modifies the verb;  “wrong” is an adjective which qualifies a noun.

    • Babydoll 70

      In that case “incorrectly” would be more appropriate.

  • Chito Villamayor

    . . . another valuable article that  makes you more impeccable in communicating.

  • http://www.facebook.com/elizabeth.allison.56 Elizabeth Allison

    i am guilty of using less incorrectly,so i will try to remember that one.

  • http://www.facebook.com/elizabeth.allison.56 Elizabeth Allison

    i am guilty of using less instead of fewer,so i will try to remember that one.

  • Sflolololo

    I had a friend who used to say she “brought the bus home” on nights she took public transit.  I used to joke that she ought to return it straight away.  Anyone else use brought and bus together?

  • http://www.facebook.com/james.wainaina.96 James Wainaina

    Never say amount of people when you mean number of people. Amount is more appropriate for things that cannot be counted, eg, amount of sugar, salt, water

  • Geofflyons

    I wouldn’t be surprised if the title was not meant to be a joke because adverbs seem to be things of the past. Sadly, the use of adjectives as adverbs seems to be so common now that I fear to expect correct usage is a lost cause. Please tell me otherwise. 

  • Babydoll 70

    I can’t stand when people only use present tense verbs.  Basically, when I read FB posts and they never put endings such as “ed” or “ing” etc. to their words.  Oh, another one is they use “was” for all occasions as if they’ve never heard of “were”.

  • Pwittlin

    When you say “in regards (adjective) to,” you mean “in regard to” or “regarding.”  You only add an “s” to the word “regard” in the salutation to a letter, e.g., “Best regards (noun) , Bill.”  So, “What is this in regards to” is always wrong.  Rather,  “To what is this regarding?”, or “To what does this regard?” is correct.  Telephone receptionists should refrain from attaching the “s” to the word “regard,” and should begin, “To what . . .?” 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Parylla/100003127438048 Larry Parylla

    People say do a complete 360 when the mean a 180. If you do a 360 you are still going in the same direction, a 180 indicates you have changed your course and are going in the opposite direction.

    People say based off of a book, when they mean based on a book.

    This is slightly off topic but a personal pet peeve of mine, anyone mentions someone won the medal of honor it is disrespectful. The MOH is not something you win like the lottery or a prize from a Craker Jax box. The correct terms are earned the MOH, received the MOH, awarded the MOH, MOH recipient, 

  • chaucer

    My pet peeve:  Using “wrong” as an adverb. 

  • TommyV

    I’m surprised that “nauseous” and “nauseated” are not on the list. Most everyone uses (not “utilizes”) the first word when they mean the second.

  • dallasclint

    My college English professor made this statement, “Good manners are preferable to good grammar any day”. For some reason, the statement has remained with me, now for more than thirty years.

  • Gary

    Tangentially:
    There – Location.
    Their – It belongs to them.
    They’re – Contraction for “they are.”

  • UFC iTard

    Oftentimes people write could/would/should of, none of which make any grammatical sense because they sound very similar to the correct could/would/should ‘ve. Which are contractions of could/would/should have.

  • David Doucet

    not my post as I never would use “irregardless”!!!

  • Jonathan

    I hate when people write “would of” instead of “would’ve.”

    As in:

    I “would of” gone but I forgot my coat.

    I can’t stand when people incorrectly replace conjunctions. I hate “would of” the most for some reason.

  • naushil

    I’ve also noticed few people say

    “Did you bought it?”

    I mean they use past tense with did,The correct way is to always use root verb with did.

    The correct is “Did you buy it?”

  • Mark Jackson

    I don’t like when people say “disinterested” when they mean “uninterested”. But, alas, so many people do this that the two words may actually be synonyms now, and we no longer have a word that quite captures what “disinterested” used to mean. “Dispassionate” is similar, but it isn’t quite the same.