The Lineup
Carl M. Cannon
May 27, 2008, 12:01 PM A Better Talking Point By Carl M. Cannon

Hillary Clinton ushered in the holiday weekend by reminding South Dakota voters that Bobby Kennedy was shot in June of 1968 the night he won the California presidential primary. She’s protested that this was a simple historic observation. True, but because she was explaining why she was sticking around in the 2008 primaries despite Barack Obama’s seemingly insurmountable lead in delegates, many people found this answer crude to the point of being creepy:  What they heard Mrs. Clinton saying was: “Well, anything can happen—Barack could get killed, and I’d have prematurely dismantled my campaign.” Let’s re-roll the tape. Sen. Clinton’s exact words were these:  

“Between my opponent and some in the media, there has been this urgency to end this… And historically that makes no sense. My husband did not wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the California primary somewhere in the middle of June, right? We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California.”


Leaving aside that Bill Clinton actually wrapped up the 1992 nomination in March, Hillary’s comment was not just poor politics, it was irrelevant.(In the event of tragedy, Democrats would be more inclined, not less, to turn to Clinton if she bows out gracefully.) Still, it’s clear the harping on Hillary to leave the race has stuck in her craw—and her husband’s, who vented this Sunday.  This sentiment is understandable. But she might have said this instead:                                   

“Many in the media and my own party have urged me to quit, and I suppose they mean well, but I have a question for them: This is the closest primary campaign since 1952—maybe the closest ever. If the person who’s running second in the closest nominating contest in history is supposed to give up as soon as they fall a little behind, why were these primaries scheduled for May or June in the first place? Don’t South Dakotans want to participate? Don’t Montanans? Party leaders punished Michigan and Florida for wanting to move up—and now they want to penalize South Dakotans for honoring the rules. I think the people of this state want to vote, and I hope they will vote for me."
Share Your Comments
Name
Comment
Remaining Character Count:
 
By VillanovaGrl329, 05/29/2008, 9:40 PM EDT
I know Sen. Clinton meant well by pointing out that she still has reasons for staying in the race; however, she should know exactly how touchy it is to bring up an assassination of a former candidate in this race. It's a thought that has passed many of our minds, but in no way did it help her case. Agreed; a speech like that written above would have gotten her further than bringing up memories of Bobby (and for that matter, JFK and MLK as well).
By WilliamHTaft, 05/28/2008, 10:53 AM EDT
PS Of course saying you know nothing about the economy (Senator McCain?) shouldn't strike hope into the hearts of many voters come November either.
By WilliamHTaft, 05/28/2008, 10:51 AM EDT
I think what is truly amazing isn't that Hillary Clinton, or any candidate, made a significant verbal blunder, it's that more candidates don't make more blunders. Given enough opportunities to speak off the cuff it's inevitable that you're going to screw up. This is the reason politicians tend to repeat themselves over and over again. Saying you're for change doesn't guaranty change, just as saying you're the right man/woman for the job doesn't always deliver you that job.
By wordsmyth, 05/27/2008, 6:53 PM EDT
She also could have talked about Reagan in 1976. As part of my historical research on the conservative movement, I was able to go through Clif White's personal notes and delegate counts from the convention (White was a veteran of the Goldwater camp) and, literally, the count came down to a couple of states--White had cut deals that could have led to a domino chain falling for Reagan. A lot of folks don't realize how close it was. I don't hink we're looking at a similar situation this time!
By billbytheriver, 05/27/2008, 6:19 PM EDT
The Clintons' "kitchen sink" strategy now includes a subliminal suggestion Obama could be killed. You can't get much lower than that.
By furlow, 05/27/2008, 6:08 PM EDT
What does Hillary think she sees that no one else does? It's obviously hard to give up a dream as big as becoming president, but the time has come. She is killing the Democratic party.
By Malaka, 05/27/2008, 4:58 PM EDT
Wow Mr. Cannon, maybe you should think of speech writing for the dems - that certainly would have been a more tactful thing to say on Hillary's part. Although, as an Obama supporter, I'm glad she didn't. Funny also that you mention that Mr. Clinton wrapped up the nomination in March of 1992, too. This may be even more interesting given Mrs. Clinton's revisionist historical perspective throughout this election (see Hail of Sniper Fire in Bosnia).
By oljoe49, 05/27/2008, 12:51 PM EDT
I THOUGHT IT WAS IN POOR JUDGEMENT BY MRS. CLINTON BUT I THINK THAT WE SHOULD JUST MOVE ON. THANKS, JOE
By momdeb2, 05/27/2008, 12:50 PM EDT
If people don't stop picking on Hillary, I just may vote for her!
About This Blog

The Lineup is our blog of lists that cover topics like health, money, career and books. Written by Reader's Digest editors and guest experts, The Lineup will give you great advice you can use in your daily life.


Advertisement
Archive