The Lineup
Carl M. Cannon
November 11, 2008, 04:24 PM Obama and the Pre-100 Days By Carl M. Cannon

Franklin D. Roosevelt, almost universally ranked as one of the great presidents of the 20th century—indeed, in the history of our Republic—won the White House in a landslide from a voting public that blamed Herbert Hoover, if not for the Great Depression itself, then for reacting to it slowly and uncertainly.

 

In the final weeks before the 1932 election, there had been signs that the United States’ economy was righting itself; Hoover, perhaps belatedly, had enlisted the federal government in the cause. It was too late to help Hoover, of course, and whatever forward momentum that had existed on Election Day promptly ended. Americans were about to experience their most grim presidential transition since 1860.

 

In that dark winter of 1932, the Great Depression reached its worst depths. As more and more banks failed in January and February, the incoming president did…nothing. Today, Franklin Roosevelt’s first term is remembered for the burst of activity of its first 100 days, but that action came 100 days too late. Wanting nothing to do with his predecessor, or his economic plans, Roosevelt kept Hoover at arms length. Certainly, FDR’s political instincts were sound: His shunning of the outgoing president helped solidify Hoover’s standing as a pariah for the ensuing five decades, and set the stage for Roosevelt's 1936 reelection. But it came at a cost to the country. There was a vacuum of leadership when the nation needed it most—and for several months. In 1932, the inauguration was held in March instead of January (the last year that this was true), a haitus that proved too long a time for our ship of state to essentially have no one at the conn.

 

At the risk of offending devotees of Saint Franklin, Barack Obama is doing it better. Obama made the point three times already that America has only one president at a time. Yet he's done this not to excuse inaction, but to remind the country that he cannot do everything he wants to do...just yet. The President-elect has already put his markers down on economic policy, and he did it directly to President Bush, whom he visited at the White House less than a week after his election. He treated Bush graciously—try to imagine FDR draping his arm around Hoover in front of the cameras the way Obama has done with Bush—while negotiating firmly with him. Yes, America has only one president at a time, but in the dark winter of 1932, it was almost as though America had no president at all. This is healthier.

 

 

Share Your Comments
Name
Comment
Remaining Character Count:
 
By jpjoshprice31, 10/01/2009, 8:57 AM EDT
The only problem with the "Change" and “The New Deal” being alike is that the American people of today differ from the American people of FDR's time. Today people spend more liberally, and they are likely to selfishly take advantage of government funds. It is happening now in colleges where people are given Pell grants, and then soon drop out after they get a check for school expense. Let’s just hope that Obama can tune in to problems like that.
By uncletumbleweed, 11/21/2008, 8:03 PM EST
Different is not necessarily better...Better always is! The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Finiancial Modernization Act of 1999, S 900, repealed the Glass-Steagall Act of 1934. Legislation, designed to prevent another Great Depression by people who lived through it, was replaced with legislation that, nine years later, has caused (thanks to technology and the same flawed logic of 1929) a crisis exponentially worse. We need leadership seeking better solutions. Better for Americans. And those looking up to US
By uncletumbleweed, 11/21/2008, 8:01 PM EST
Different is not necessarily better...Better always is! The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Finiancial Modernization Act of 1999, S 900, repealed the Glass-Steagall Act of 1934. Legislation, designed to prevent another Great Depression by people who lived through it, was replaced with legislation that, nine years later, has caused (thanks to technology and the same flawed logic of 1929) a crisis exponentially worse. We need leadership seeking better solutions. Better for Americans. And those looking up to US
By solarstar03, 11/12/2008, 8:57 PM EST
I have never, in my lifetime, seen a lamer duck President than we now have. Amazing still, are the number of people whose critique of the President-elect (as in, Bill Crystal and his ilk) is more severe than our current President's numerous political blunders.I'm sorry, but "no President at all" is what we've had the past four years.
About This Blog

The Lineup is our blog of lists that cover topics like health, money, career and books. Written by Reader's Digest editors and guest experts, The Lineup will give you great advice you can use in your daily life.


Advertisement
Archive