Obama and the Pre-100 Days

Subscribe To This Blog RSS

November 11, 2008

Franklin D. Roosevelt, almost universally ranked as one of the great presidents of the 20th century—indeed, in the history of our Republic—won the White House in a landslide from a voting public that blamed Herbert Hoover, if not for the Great Depression itself, then for reacting to it slowly and uncertainly.

 

In the final weeks before the 1932 election, there had been signs that the United States’ economy was righting itself; Hoover, perhaps belatedly, had enlisted the federal government in the cause. It was too late to help Hoover, of course, and whatever forward momentum that had existed on Election Day promptly ended. Americans were about to experience their most grim presidential transition since 1860.

 

In that dark winter of 1932, the Great Depression reached its worst depths. As more and more banks failed in January and February, the incoming president did…nothing. Today, Franklin Roosevelt’s first term is remembered for the burst of activity of its first 100 days, but that action came 100 days too late. Wanting nothing to do with his predecessor, or his economic plans, Roosevelt kept Hoover at arms length. Certainly, FDR’s political instincts were sound: His shunning of the outgoing president helped solidify Hoover’s standing as a pariah for the ensuing five decades, and set the stage for Roosevelt's 1936 reelection. But it came at a cost to the country. There was a vacuum of leadership when the nation needed it most—and for several months. In 1932, the inauguration was held in March instead of January (the last year that this was true), a haitus that proved too long a time for our ship of state to essentially have no one at the conn.

 

At the risk of offending devotees of Saint Franklin, Barack Obama is doing it better. Obama made the point three times already that America has only one president at a time. Yet he's done this not to excuse inaction, but to remind the country that he cannot do everything he wants to do...just yet. The President-elect has already put his markers down on economic policy, and he did it directly to President Bush, whom he visited at the White House less than a week after his election. He treated Bush graciously—try to imagine FDR draping his arm around Hoover in front of the cameras the way Obama has done with Bush—while negotiating firmly with him. Yes, America has only one president at a time, but in the dark winter of 1932, it was almost as though America had no president at all. This is healthier.

 

 

NEXT POST: Sore Winners and Gracious Losers

PREVIOUS POST: White House Ghosts

Must Read
Should Everyone Read This?
Comments On This Post
By uncletumbleweed, 11/21/2008, 8:03 PM EST

Different is not necessarily better...Better always is! The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Finiancial Modernization Act of 1999, S 900, repealed the Glass-Steagall Act of 1934. Legislation, designed to prevent another Great Depression by people who lived through it, was replaced with legislation that, nine years later, has caused (thanks to technology and the same flawed logic of 1929) a crisis exponentially worse. We need leadership seeking better solutions. Better for Americans. And those looking up to US

By uncletumbleweed, 11/21/2008, 8:01 PM EST

Different is not necessarily better...Better always is! The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Finiancial Modernization Act of 1999, S 900, repealed the Glass-Steagall Act of 1934. Legislation, designed to prevent another Great Depression by people who lived through it, was replaced with legislation that, nine years later, has caused (thanks to technology and the same flawed logic of 1929) a crisis exponentially worse. We need leadership seeking better solutions. Better for Americans. And those looking up to US

By solarstar03, 11/12/2008, 8:57 PM EST

I have never, in my lifetime, seen a lamer duck President than we now have. Amazing still, are the number of people whose critique of the President-elect (as in, Bill Crystal and his ilk) is more severe than our current President's numerous political blunders.I'm sorry, but "no President at all" is what we've had the past four years.

Your Comments

You will be asked to sign in or register to post a comment

Characters Remaining

Advertisement
Recent Posts
Farewell and Keep the Faith
President  Obama  mentioned,  rather casually  I  thought,  at  last  week's  White  House  press  conference  that  the unemployment  rate  in  this  country  was  going  to  surpass  10  percent. ....
Q and A: Why Iran Matters
Q:  Why  not  just  ignore  Iran,  and  its  fraudulent  elections?  What  do  we  care? A:  Iran  is  a  large  nation  that  is  gaining  enormous  influence  in ....
Americans Still Dream Big
A  poll  that  came  across  the  transom  this  week  asked  Americans  whether,  despite  the  challenging  economic  times,  they  "still  have  big  dreams"  for  their  lives. ....
Ten Intriguing Poll Numbers
51  percent  of  Americans  now  categorize  themselves  as  “pro-life”  on  abortion,  with  42  percent  choosing  themselves  as  “pro-choice.”  These  numbers  come  from  the  “Values  and ....
Eight Joe Biden Gaffes

Good  thing  the  blog  name  “Loose  Cannon”  is  taken—otherwise  it  would  be  the  perfect  title  for  the  White  House  website  section  on  the  vice  president. ....

See All Blogs

Advertisement