Reader Digest Version Global

24 Things You Might Be Saying Wrong

The Reader's Digest Version of all those confusing words and seemingly random rules you missed in English class.

By Melissa DeMeo and Paul Silverman from Reader's Digest | September 2010

You might say: Who

You might mean: Whom

Why: It all depends. Do you need a subject or an object? A subject (who) is the actor of the sentence: “Who left the roller skates on the sidewalk?” An object (whom) is the acted-upon: “Whom are you calling?” Parents, hit the Mute button when Dora the Explorer shouts, “Who do we ask for help when we don’t know which way to go?”

You almost never mean: Brother-in-laws, runner-ups, hole in ones, etc.

You almost always mean: Brothers-in-law, runners-up, holes in one, etc.

Why: Plurals of these compound nouns are formed by adding an s to the thing there’s more than one of (brothers, not laws). Some exceptions: words ending in ful (mouthfuls) and phrases like cul-de-sacs.

You almost never mean: Try and

You almost always mean: Try to

Why: Try and try again, yes, but if you’re planning to do something, use the infinitive form: “I’m going to try to run a marathon.” Commenting on an online story about breakups, one woman wrote, “A guy I dated used to try and impress me with the choice of books he was reading.” It’s no surprise that the relationship didn’t last.

You almost never mean: Different than

You almost always mean: Different from

Why: This isn’t the biggest offense, but if you can easily substitute from for than (My mother’s tomato sauce is different from my mother-in-law’s), do it. Use than for comparisons: My mother’s tomato sauce is better than my mother-in-law’s.

You almost never mean: Beg the question

You almost always mean: Raise the question

Why: Correctly used, “begging the question” is like making a circular argument (I don’t like you because you’re so unlikable). But unless you’re a philosophy professor, you shouldn’t ever need this phrase. Stick to “raise the question.”

You might say: More than

You can also say: Over

Why: The two are interchangeable when the sense is “Over 6,000 hats were sold.” We like grammarian Bryan Garner’s take on it: “The charge that over is inferior to more than is a baseless crotchet.”

Sponsored Links

Your Comments

  • Ogickas

    You forgot Just can’t when you mean, Can’t just. This one really gets to me.

  • Ogickas

    You forgot Just can’t when you mean, Can’t just. This one really gets to me.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OPLCUGWQ3HMHZZGJN3CB24DX4U DB Cooper

    exactly!

  • Nemo

    You also omitted my pet peeve – those who pronounce the word Nuclear, as Nuke-You-ler !
    LOOK at the spelling!   The word does NOT contain the letter ‘U’!

  • Nemo

    You also omitted my pet peeve – those who pronounce the word Nuclear, as Nuke-You-ler !
    LOOK at the spelling!   The word does NOT contain the letter ‘U’!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1228424775 Kathy Bond

    Uh, yes it does contain a ‘U’…

  • Ak907guy

    If I WERE (or is it if I WAS) … as in, “If I *were* a rich man …” (singing)

  • Dan Reese

    Ironically, a “related video” below this article is titled “How to Eat Less Calories”.

  • Dan Reese

    In my experience, many use mano a mano correctly (a fist fight).

  • DQUser

    I hate those news reraders on TV who insist on pronouncing “international” as “innernational.”

  • Todd

    Coupon (coo) not Qupon

  • Ewittenb

    I think you mean “saying incorrectly,” not “saying wrong.”

  • Ewittenb

    I think you mean “saying incorrectly,” not “saying wrong.”

  • GDJ

    Sorry, but above is wrong on more than and over: More indicates quantity. Over indicates location.

  • GDJ

    I agree. It means “hand to hand” as in hand to hand combat.

  • lisper

    ‘Very unique’.  A thing is either unique or it isn’t, no need to qulify the description.

  • gdj

    Pet Peeve: Wanna-be editors who think it is improper to split an infinitive under any circumstances, when in fact the majority of modern English usage guides have dropped the objection to the split infinitive. So to them I say to boldly go where most grammar authorities have gone…..and get over it, fecause when you insist on never splitting an infinitive, you end up sounding like some rigid, pretentious English snob from the 19th century.

  • D2e2z2d

    I hate these Grammar Nazis, they forget about regional variations and believe the world needs to follow their parochial orthodoxy.

  • Carolyn Larson

    What about the improper use of “I?”. So often used in place of “me.”

  • Tanjoniquebs

    This article is stupid and I could care less. Is this writer an English major. If not, he/she does not have the authority to tell people what they are saying wrong.

  • Tanjoniquebs

    I this has a lot to do with dialect and what part of the United States a person is from. Southern people tend to pronounce it as Qupon. I know I do.

  • Tanjoniquebs

    So true on the regional variations.

  • Tallen1120

    People, mostly teens, can’t make a sentence without using “like”. I’m like…its like…shes like…
    You sound  as if you are from the west coast.  Nothing is “like”…it either is or it isn’t.  Even  supposedly educated adults are running it into the ground.  Ignorance runs rampant.

  • Tallen1120

    People, mostly teens, can’t make a sentence without using “like”. I’m like…its like…shes like…
    You sound  as if you are from the west coast.  Nothing is “like”…it either is or it isn’t.  Even  supposedly educated adults are running it into the ground.  Ignorance runs rampant.

  • Tallen1120

    People, mostly teens, can’t make a sentence without using “like”. I’m like…its like…shes like…
    You sound  as if you are from the west coast.  Nothing is “like”…it either is or it isn’t.  Even  supposedly educated adults are running it into the ground.  Ignorance runs rampant.

  • Aimeecowan

    Once I get started, I could write a book on this subject. Things like “could care less”, “anyways”, and that one where people double the “is”, can’t think of an example right now, are like fingernails on a chalkboard to my ear. Another one: “alls it is is”, or “alls I’m saying is”. People get offended if you correct them in any way, but I would welcome being informed if I’m saying something grammatically incorrect. There are ways to correct, but most people don’t want to think about speech before speaking. My own mother carries a grudge for decades when her ignorance is gently informed. I admit to being embarrassed when my children and grands laugh at some old-fashioned or regional speech patterns I use, and some I won’t change because it boils down to tomato-tomato ? thinking. But when it’s something that is saying the opposite of what we mean, we need to reconsider, at least. 

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JV34ISDM6JT4HFPR5THWRNSRGI Jeff

    Or my personal favorite:  a ‘left- (or -right) hand turn.’  Turns, of course, don’t have hands.  You mean to say a ‘left (or right) turn.’  Or lane, or side…. well, you get the idea.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JV34ISDM6JT4HFPR5THWRNSRGI Jeff

    Oops!!  Good idea to read (and comprehend) what you write.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JV34ISDM6JT4HFPR5THWRNSRGI Jeff

    Excellent!!  An all-too-common earsore.

  • DeClerq

    You COULDN’T car less.  Did you not read the article?

  • Anonymous

    “If I were” is correct.

  • Keith

    or ‘saying wrongly’. An adverb, not adjective, goes with a verb.

  • Liquid_schwartz

    irregardless – adding a negating prefix to a word does not give it emphasis, it makes sound like a fool.
    pet peeve – if something peeves you don’t keep it as a pet

  • SomeGuy

    Ensure: taking action so something will happen.

    Insure: taking out a policy

  • Spotdog19

    Are YOU an english major? If not, you don’t have the authority to tell others that they don’t have the authority to tell others they are wrong.  You probably won’t understand that…

  • Sched1

    They missed:

    You never mean:  chomping at the bit
    You always mean:  champing at the bit

  • http://twitter.com/PastorJasonGant Pastor Jason Gant

    There are actually 25 things, not 24. The title of the above article “24 Things You Might Be Saying Wrong” is, in itself, incorrect. “Wrong” is an adjective, as in “He’s the wrong man.” Hence, the ADVERB should be used here, making the correct statement to be “24 Things You Might Be Saying Wrongly.”  I guess the authors behaved badly!

  • Kaliphoenix

    Some have said we need to consider regional variations when dealing with pronunciation.  No, we don’t.  People pronounce words correctly or they don’t.  People use proper grammar or they don’t.

    I listen to audiobooks and notice that the number of narrators who pronounce words incorrectly in increasing.

  • Gunther

    This is one anal retentive author here. I couldn’t care less how people use these cliches….

  • Rainbow Writer75

    My biggest pet peeve is “irregardless”. IRREGARDLESS IS NOT A WORD! The word is just simply, “regardless”. I’ve heard countless people use this and it drives me crazy every time. Especially when it’s a college professor or a teacher.

  • http://www.facebook.com/terrie1958 Terrie Smith Nielsen

    Yes, right after the “N” and nowhere else.  ONE U.  Tell that to my husband.  “NU.” “CLEAR.” As in Nucleus, as in molecules…

  • http://www.facebook.com/terrie1958 Terrie Smith Nielsen

    Of course, then there is Moreover…

  • http://www.facebook.com/terrie1958 Terrie Smith Nielsen

    Agreed on the irregardless.  On the other hand, many of us DO nurse peeves, grudges and the like as if they WERE pets.

  • http://www.facebook.com/terrie1958 Terrie Smith Nielsen

    I’ve noticed recently that there are too many people using the work “peak” when they mean “peek.”  I’ve seen lots of references to “sneak peaks” relating to movies, gifts and the like.  “Peak” refers to the top of something, such as a mountain or a career path.  “Peek” refers to looking briefly, as in “peekaboo.”

  • Barone

    You are wrong. Pronunciations vary by region. So do words themselves. Go to England and “orientate” yourself.  Have some PE-can pie in Georgia and some chocolate “pe-CAN” ice cream in Ohio. Just because somebody does not pronounce a word the way you were taught does not make them wrong. 

  • Darcismckid

    they missed my biggest pet peeve – The Phrase “these ones”…  As in “I want these ones here to be taken over there.”  its redundant….  These is sufficient… there is no need for “ones” to be added!

  • Darcismckid

    they missed my biggest pet peeve – The Phrase “these ones”…  As in “I want these ones here to be taken over there.”  its redundant….  These is sufficient… there is no need for “ones” to be added!

  • Bob

    I’m from Ohio and I want to clearifiy the comment about pecans.  In refering to the nut, the proper pronounication is pe-con.  A pee-can is what we use on the boat to relieve ourselves.

  • MRSCIPPIO

    CONJUGATING THE VERB “TO BE”: I WAS; YOU WERE; HE,SHE OR IT WAS.

  • Anonymous

    Correct, in the indicative mood.  “If I were” is in the subjunctive mood. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mark-Hillyard/100000971153370 Mark Hillyard

    I and my wife would like to agree to disagree!

  • Dumdum

    ‘vehicle’ is one of my “nails across a blackboard” .personal preference is vee-i-kl.  not vee-hi-kl.

  • tashacakes

    Here are several grammatical faux pas that I find a little annoying, mostly because they tend to make people sound uneducated.
    … using a preposition to end a sentence.
    “Let’s find out where we’re at.” ["Let's find out where we are."]
    … using a plural attributive adjective when gender is unknown.
    “Someone left their dog in the car.”
    ["Someone left his or her dog in the car."]
    … the completely inexplicible pluralization of something that can’t possibly be plural.
    “This is your book. I’ve got mines.”

  • Guest

    It’s actually culs-de-sac, NOT cul-de-sacs.  It works the same as brothers-in-law.

  • Plwww

    Indeed. Language isn’t fixed, but extremely dynamic. The pronunciation and meaning of words shift constantly over time. New words are created and old ones effectively die from disuse. The best we can say for correctness is, “this is the most common usage”. Oddly enough, it is the acknowledgement of this dynamic nature of language that makes me appreciate a thoughtful adherence to common standards: I hate the idea that, “This was like, so awesome” may someday be considered “correct”.

  • Lizochka65

    No one receives an “authority badge” to correct others, and–believe it or not–some non-majors even know English rules! It’s a disconcerting sign of the times that too many people can’t use English properly.  I majored in two foreign languages but I most definitely know my mother tongue well enough to spot glaring errors.  

  • Lizochka65

    their/there/they’re; to/too; its/it’s, apostrophes where they don’t belong, not using an object after a preposition (between him and me, not between he and I), starting a sentence with “Me and him…” and a few others, like “could of” and “minus well” (might as well)… English can be such a beautiful language when it’s used correctly!

  • Anonymous

    Yes or no are always a better choice than absolutely.

  • Anonymous

    Oh, yes – it’s not k’laaa’meh’duh, it’s kil’o'meter.

  • Irene Graham

    HOW TO RESPOND TO “HOW ARE YOU?”

  • Battyham45

    My favorite — Say “J C Penney”, not “J C Penny”.  Excuse me.  I write those, not say those.  When spoken, who can tell how it is spelled.

  • Battyham45

    My favorite — Say “J C Penney”, not “J C Penny”.  Excuse me.  I write those, not say those.  When spoken, who can tell how it is spelled.

  • GrammarJew

    I’m sorry, but “Someone left his or her dog in the car” sounds ridiculous. As long as he or she (see?) doesn’t spell it “they’re”, I’m not going to complain.

  • Guest

    Love this! another pet peeve of mine is is the use of Historical when theny mean historic.  Current events (the election and inauguration of Pres. Obama, The capture of Bin Laden, etc) are not Historical, they are historic…

    Historic: 
    Famous or important in history, or potentially so

    Historical : 
    Of or concerning history; concerning past events.Belonging to the past, not the present.

  • Tommyniles

    I might have titled this article “24 Things One Might Be Saying Wrongly”.

    -Ivy League a-hole
    @martykayzee:disqus 

  • Tommyniles

    I might have titled this article “24 Things One Might Be Saying Wrongly”.

    -Ivy League a-hole
    @martykayzee:disqus 

  • Matt Hammond

    And also,

    - “Ain’t Nothing”
    - “Those Ones”

  • Griffin01

    I hate it when people pronounce “especially” as “ek-specially”. 

  • Dan

    What about when people say “just between you and I”. I hear this all the time on TV and movies. Using the nominative case after a prepositions is a no-no. It is such a give-away that the person using such as “she gave Bob and I a lecture on etiquette”.

  • Dan

    What about when people say “just between you and I”. I hear this all the time on TV and movies. Using the nominative case after a prepositions is a no-no. It is such a give-away that the person using such as “she gave Bob and I a lecture on etiquette”.

  • Dan

    What about when people say “just between you and I”. I hear this all the time on TV and movies. Using the nominative case after a prepositions is a no-no. It is such a give-away that the person using such as “she gave Bob and I a lecture on etiquette”.

  • Dan

    What about when people say “just between you and I”. I hear this all the time on TV and movies. Using the nominative case after a prepositions is a no-no. It is such a give-away that the person using such as “she gave Bob and I a lecture on etiquette”.

  • Dan

    correction – preposition – sorry should have proofed it before posting

  • Dan

    correction – preposition – sorry should have proofed it before posting

  • Dan

    correction – preposition – sorry should have proofed it before posting

  • Arizzo313

    News reporters have replaced yes and no to a question with absolutely. Also, it appears that sunk has replaced sank in many articles and newscasts. “The ship sunk off the coast yesterday.” What’s going on? However, in day-to-day speech, it often sounds pretentious to end a sentence correctly by using “I” rather than “me.”

  • Okello

    ‘None of us here is perfect’ NOT ‘None of us here are perfect’ . I feel saddened that an African like me  had to correct a Stanford English graduate!

  • Anonymous

    I suggest we all defer to the wisdom of Norm Crosby and Yogi Berra for these matters. 

  • Iheartjuliephan

    But…the plural of “cul-de-sac” IS “culS-de-sac, so it isn’t an exception to that rule. Thanks, Gilmore Girls, for teaching me that!

  • tashacakes

    I think, “he or she” sounds correct, not ridiculous. However, I appreciate your opinion.

  • Lusephir

    I agree with this point in abstract. I speak using different accents because I was raised in theater but some people really don’t know how strange an accent can sound to one who may be foreign to the region of it’s origin.

    While I will agree that the preservation of the patriotically orthodoxy may seem oppressing and threatening know this: That simply the English Language is composed of standards and rules that must be strictly observed and adhered to in their truest form.

    However, no one ever said the Nazis had to wipe everyone else out.

    With greatest respect to the colorful and charming nature of your regional variations!

  • Bnana3

    Jewelry– not jewl-ery
    Realtor–not real-a-tor
    Realty—not real-a-ty

  • DD

    My pet peeve is “irregardless” when they really mean “regardless”

  • Rockfrance

    Well, actually “wrong” is both an adjective and an adverb, according to Cambridge dictionary.

  • Rockfrance

    Well, if you have an English grammar or a dictionary, check it out and you’ll see that the word “wrong” is both and adjective and an adverb.  The authors can be bad at maths, but there is no grammar mistake.

  • Rockfrance

    Grow up, buddy!

  • Rockfrance

    Grow up, buddy!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000117739822 Daniel Przybylski

    “Any more questions for Judi or I?”..

    It drives me nuts when people choose the case of their pronouns based on nothing more than “what sounds right”.

  • Carissa Enteria

    very helpful for a second language teacher like me..thanks so much!

  • http://twitter.com/kokuaguy Michael Salling

    always …

  • nbsp

    Yes, but I frequently see mano y mano or mano e mano which mean hand and hand in Spanish and, I think, Italian.

  • nbsp

    Yes, I have finally been dragged kicking and screaming to the realization that English is always evolving.  At 60, I am learning to be flexible.

  • Jo Ann

    Finally! I’m so glad I’m not the only person on the planet that still notices these things. For a while, I was worried that no one cared anymore!

  • Jo Ann aka Grammar Queen

    Ugh, I agree! I’m surprised at how many people mispronounce this word, many of them well-educated. It boggles my mind!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=807660441 Dan Livermore

    Please stop saying (for-tay) when you mean (fort). Yes, they are both spelled “forte”, but they are not the same word. (Fort) is a personal strength, (For-tay) is a musical term. 

    Also, the correct phrase is “old stamping grounds” (as in the area of grass stamped down by animal hooves). You’re wrong if you say “old stomping grounds.”

    Just because “everyone uses it that way” doesn’t make it right. Common usage be damned, rules is rules. 

  • Eyeinthesky

    As in: you can’t just USE INCORRECT GRAMMAR IN THE TITLE OF AN ARTICLE ABOUT THE USE OF BAD GRAMMAR!! Unbelievable. Should be: ‘Saying INCORRECTLY’, not ‘Saying Wrong.’ Sheesh! They pay their copy editors?!

  • Mbrumble

    How about My wife and I …

  • Flowrlady1

    I sincerely hope this is read by everyone.  There is a LOT of confusion out there and I am so tired of having my attention diverted from the real point of the conversation to a point of grammar

  • Flowrlady1

    The word DOES use a ‘u’ but not the second syllable!

  • Flowrlady1

    The word DOES use a ‘u’ but not the second syllable!

  • verderf

    In the example “the money that is on the table”  sounds much better when we drop ‘that is’ and simply say, “The money on the table is yours.”

  • verderf

    In the example “the money that is on the table”  sounds much better when we drop ‘that is’ and simply say, “The money on the table is yours.”

  • no worries

    All of a sudden, or all of the sudden???

  • Slarsrules

    Holes in one?  So, if I get three holes in one, that would imply that I swung once, and got my ball in three holes.  Perhaps you mean, three hole-in-ones, which would indicate that a “hole-in-one” is a discrete thing, of which there can be more than one, as opposed to holes, which are multiple, and one, which is singular.

  • Linda Lawton

    The one that really gets me is ‘these ones’ when you should just say ‘these’.

  • samirmondle

    Since my boyhood I have been learning from Reader’s Digest.  How could I ever forget:  Quotable Quotes, and so many other words of wisdom.  Bravi!! Please keep up the wonderful work.  My sincere thanks and gratitude……Samir, NY

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_US4QTW6SLOXQCGOYANKKFBGR7E Paul

    I myself (me myself)

  • sokkergrl

    How about irregardless…hear this all the time…regardless of how incorrect it is!

  • Boogywstew

    It’s amazing how many people want to spend time on a “desert” island instead of a deserted island.

  • Anonymous

    Don’t forget the confusion between there, their and they’re, as well as to, too and two. 

  • Anonymous

     I agree. That sounds like fingernails on a chalk board to me. My response is that if something is difficult to comprehend, does that mean that it’s unkular?

  • Mclean_dm

    I did look at the spelling; “Nuclear” does contain the letter ‘U.’

  • Suudo_nim

    INCORRECTLY!!!!

  • Suudo_nim

    INCORRECTLY!!!!

  • Asdf

    Uhh, how about the title?  It should read “24 Things You Might Be Saying WrongLY”  or “…Incorrectly” as someone else suggested.

    You guys should have covered this common error, where folks drop the “-ly” when saying things like “This article was written perfect.”

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jared-Lewis/524912918 Jared Lewis

    Its funny when someone tries to say that the others use of language is incorrect. Language evolves over time, and these self limiting rules are only built to make some people feel superior to others. Your systems of control get old to those who see through them.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jared-Lewis/524912918 Jared Lewis

    Its funny when someone tries to say that the others use of language is incorrect. Language evolves over time, and these self limiting rules are only built to make some people feel superior to others. Your systems of control get old to those who see through them.

  • Anonymous

    Re the article by Melissa DeMeo and Paul Silverman from Reader’s Digest | September 2010.

    24 Things You Might Be Saying Wrong.
     Did you mean to say:”24 things you might be saying wrongly”?  (adverb)

      I was also very disappointed to not see you  include the commonly misused words:  there, their, they’re.  Just a glance at professionally written articles every day in the media will show the misuse of these words.

  • Jovanna

    What about the biggie that I almost never hear said correctly, the phrase,  ”in vogue”…it’s redundant…  “vogue” mean “in fashion.”  So if you’re saying “The dress is in vogue”…you’re really saying: “The dress is IN IN fashion.”  It should be said:  The dress is vogue.

  • Anonymous

    Zackly, meaning his breath smells zackly like his bum! Example:  Obummy has a case of the zacklies!

  • Laurevincent

    I can’t believe it. Nobody mentioned my pet peeve. It is so widespread, I see it online daily. Many people use the word “of” instead of “have”. I think it comes from hearing the contractions could’ve, should’ve, would’ve, etc. It sounds like “could of” instead of “could have”, which is what the contraction means. I’ve seen this in otherwise well written pieces.

  • Me

    How about the difference between “between” and “among?”  Or “different than” (comparative), not “different from?”

  • Keng

    I receive telephone solicitation calls in which the caller wants to “ax” me a question. No sale, dumbo.

  • Jameshcarlson

    Don’t you mean “wrongly”?

  • Anonymous

    I axed. cracks me up every time.

  • Teddyjackeddy

    Ax
    Ash
    Ask
    Yo dog let me ax you a question. Hey, let me ash you something.
    What you really mean to say is, hey may I ask you sumpin?

  • Jcn

    Unsurprisingly, the very title of this grammar tutorial contains the common grammatical error of confusing “may” with “might”. Usually the error is in the opposite direction, though. Dear Melissa and Paul, “might” is used in a hypothetical construction OR as the past form of “may”, neither of which is happening here.

  • Whatever

    Wow… irony… how about trying one of these – “24 Things You Might be Saying Incorrectly/Wrongly” or “24 Things You Might be Saying in a Manner that is Wrong”

  • Carl nelsen

    things you might be saying “wrong” or do you mean wrongly

  • Karri

    U is the second letter!

  • Anonymous

    Also, “irregardless”…instead of “regardless.”

  • Krankankor

    ‘More than’ and ‘Over’ should not be used interchangeably. Over is a position as is under or beside. More than is a numerical expression used when quantities are being discussed.

    He threw his hat OVER the fence which was MORE THAN hundreds on the ground.

  • Shelbihaught

    My pet peeve:  eager and anxious.  “I am anxious to see my boyfriend tonight.  We will have so much fun!”  Don’t you mean that you are “eager” to see your boyfriend?  Why would you be “nervous” “anxious” to see your boyfriend?  Wouldn’t you be “eager” “excited” to see him?

  • John

    Nemo,
    I think you should check out the second letter of the word nuclear.  It is a u.

  • Alice_E

    Whom is an obsolete word. 

  • Anonymous

    From whom did you hear this?

  • Gducote

    Asking a question: Where is it at?   You don’t need to add the word at.
    Correct: Where is it?

  • Perniciouskitty

     ”Prolly” or “probly” instead of “probably”, “joo-lery” instead of “joo-well-ry”, “tempachur” instead of “temperature”. One of my favorite ways to confuse a child is the old “yes you can, but you may not” game.

     Also, if ignorance of proper use of language renders it obsolete, I give up.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/YN6JPJTGLW2OBFSAUKFJ363S3I turq

    To persuade or convince..those two always got me.

  • Eljahn

     I’m hopeful the title was meant as a joke.

  • Eljahn

     I’m hopeful the title was meant as a joke.

  • Anonymous

    More supposed “words”, misused and mispronounced words I hear  a lot.

    -kindergarden instead of kindergarten
    -liberry instead of library
    -spinage instead of spinach
    -Walmark instead of Walmart
    -then instead of than.  More then words…

    Saying you have a temperature, when you mean fever or elevated temperature..  Everyone has a temperature.

    -whole entire. As in: “I think this is the whole entire list”.  There are alot more… but I think I will end with that misspelling of a lot.  

  • coolhead

    Language is merely consensus, people.  The English spoken five hundred years ago sounds almost nothing like what we speak today because all of the mispronunciations, foreign influences, and all the other factors that influence language became so pervasive that they unavoidably went from being regarded as vulgar or incorrect to becoming a legitimate part of the language.  I’d so love to hear how English sounds five hundred years from now!

  • http://twitter.com/Mosquera_NL Nance Lee Mosquera

    I expected the article to begin by pointing that out! I hope it was meant to be funny.

  • A Good Broad

    Their There They’re   These are usually used inproperly.

  • Kay Lowe

    Some of my pet peeves are using “would have” instead of “had”. I don’t know the grammatical rules, but I cringe when I hear people say things like, “If he would have listened to the directions…”, instead of, “If he had listened to the directions..”. Or, “If I would have known you were coming, I’d have baked a cake”, instead of “If I HAD known that you were coming, I would have baked a cake.”

  • Kay Lowe

    Some of my pet peeves are using “would have” instead of “had”. I don’t know the grammatical rules, but I cringe when I hear people say things like, “If he would have listened to the directions…”, instead of, “If he had listened to the directions..”. Or, “If I would have known you were coming, I’d have baked a cake”, instead of “If I HAD known that you were coming, I would have baked a cake.”

  • Kay Lowe

    As is “you’re” and “your”. Constantly misused.

  • Kay Lowe

    As is “you’re” and “your”. Constantly misused.

  • Tightroper

    So like she goes, “What’s your problem?”  And I’m like, “None uh your business.”

  • Becky

     They forgot two of my biggest irritations–when someone says “invested” when they mean “vested” as in “By the power VESTED in me, I now pronounce you man & wife”, but instead I repeatedly hear people use the word ‘invested’ instead.  Another one is “Butt naked”.  No, it’s BUCK naked.

  • Ryan M

    “Very unique”

    There are no levels of “uniqueness”.  You would never say, “that trinket is very one-of-a-kind.”

  • http://twitter.com/jackitweets JACQUELINE LIPPMAN

    Hilarious vs hysterical.

  • http://twitter.com/jackitweets JACQUELINE LIPPMAN

    Hilarious vs hysterical.

  • Anonymous

    After reading this, I am going to drive on the parkway until I get home to park in the driveway.

  • Marlowe01267

    You might say “24 Things You might Say Wrong”.
    Interestingly enough, the headline of your article contains the very kind of errors you go on to correct.You should say:  ”24 Things You might Say Incorrectly”.

  • http://twitter.com/topscientist Top Scientist

    Uh actually, half-wits. “wrong” is perfectly acceptable as an adverb, and the title is fine.

  • CBDemartini

    You mean ‘ say incorrectly’? 
     

  • Tampa Bay Ted

     I want to throw my telescope at the science documentaries on tv that continually use further instead of farther for distance…Saturn is FARTHER from Earth than Mars. The Brits use further for distance all the time, so it may be a regionalism on their part. However, Americans have no such excuse. Then there’s discrete and discreet. It’s a DISCREET encounter. Discrete means a fine gradation Arghhhhh! And then there are the folks that use an apostrophe and the plural s…toy’s for sale, boy’s and girl’s dance.

  • Tampa Bay Ted

     I want to throw my telescope at the science documentaries on tv that continually use further instead of farther for distance…Saturn is FARTHER from Earth than Mars. The Brits use further for distance all the time, so it may be a regionalism on their part. However, Americans have no such excuse. Then there’s discrete and discreet. It’s a DISCREET encounter. Discrete means a fine gradation Arghhhhh! And then there are the folks that use an apostrophe and the plural s…toy’s for sale, boy’s and girl’s dance.

  • Drs

    Don’t you mean to say “Hopefully, the title was meant as a joke.”?

  • Drs

    Don’t you mean to say “Hopefully, the title was meant as a joke.”?

  • Windspiele

    Texet-ed…I never text Ed.
    At about…it’s either at 8 o’clock or about 8 o’clock but will never be both.

  • Windspiele

    I work at grammar but my spelling sux.

  • Sylskinner2008

    I’m glad somebody still knows difference between ‘bring and take” I wish we could stop using ‘convince’ when we mean ‘persuade, ‘fault’ when we mean ‘blame’ and most of all ’ I” when we mean ‘me”  Ogickas, a similiar one that gets to me is “What are you still doing here?’  Should be “What are you doing, still here?’ Or better, ‘ Why are you still here?”

  • Sylkinner2008

    I hope that was a joke.  Hopefully has been used incorrectly for years.Nance is correct.

  • Sylskinner2008

    ‘His or her’ is correct, their is plural, and should not be used to indicate one person.. 

  • Sylskinner2008

    ‘Ain’t Nothing” is, of course, incorrect, but ‘ain’t’ is often used as slang for emphasis, by people who usually speak correctly.

  • Lynzbyz

    What about exspecially (not a word?) vs. especially?  or Irregardless (not a word?) vs. Regardless?  Orientate vs. orient (verb)?

  • Sobreea

    Where I live, we don’t use whom.  Everybody uses ‘who’ like ‘whom’ doesn’t exist. 

    I know one guy that says ‘whom’, and when he does, it sounds weird. 

  • http://www.cowboyjedi.com/ Grambler

    At risk of embarrassing myself, I don’t understand this pun: : “The charge that over is inferior to more than is a baseless crotchet.”

  • http://www.cowboyjedi.com/ Grambler

    When invited to a function such as a party, though, is the point of view the location of the function?  In other words, “I’ll bring dessert,” or, “Shall I bring the wine?”

  • http://www.cowboyjedi.com/ Grambler

    For future lists, two commonly misused words: hopefully and literally.

  • Albee1956

    You never mean: Could care less
    You always mean: Couldn’t care less—I disagree.
    Could care less is correct also.  It is said sarcastically, such as, ” I could care less what you think!”
    with emphasis on ‘less’, meaning that you really could NOT care less.

  • Joee

    You forgot you’re vs. your. Many people type your when they mean you’re

  • Mike

    Also, one does not graduate high school; ond graduates from high school.

  • Astull

     Absolutely does contain a u. But i do feel your pain.

  • nightwriter

     Webster’s New Twentieth Century Dictionary, Unabridged (the bible of dictionaries, and, if you don’t have one, you should get one): wrong, adv., amiss; incorrectly; in a wrong manner, direction, etc. …. In other words, like “fast,” “wrong” can be either an adjective or adverb. I’d suggest you be a bit more careful before blasting someone for using incorrect grammar.

  • guest

    “Alternate” and “alternative” as a confusing pair.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1187520448 Luke O’Neal

    how about when people in kansas say something like, “I need to drive up to texas ” or “i need to drive down to nebraska”  . thats bugs me like crazy. If you are headed to the south, you should say “down” and if you are headed to the north, you should say “up” .

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1017580221 Dave Rhoads

    But when you are composing a tweet in 140 characters (fewer/less) less IS fewer!

  • SDA Doug

    Since the ownership of the dog is in question why not say “Someone left a dog in the car”?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000026718729 Doug Becker

    Most people make this mistake… You do not “MAKE” a decision. But rather, you “TAKE” one.

  • E.A. Blair

    You never need to say “reason why”;  the “why” is unnecessary unless you’re reciting Tennyson, in which case, “reason” is a verb, not a noun.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_LIOXBCSJTAYNDAWS2CP3XZLCAA Tony

    Any publication,- from small town fishwrap to major metropolitan newspapers and nationaly distributed magazines, it never fails that I find simple errors that a third grader should be able to spot.

  • Lilly Munster

    No, you are only describing “speech impediments.”  The rules and pronunciations do not change just because you live near a lot of illiterate people.  There is no “orientate,” unless you didn’t pay attention.   As for PEcan,  it’s from the south,  where the accents are from mush-mouthed laziness and lack of education.    That is precisely why major universities have
    “remedial English” for those who had a bad education in English, or grew up in the south.
    You will not be employed in a Fortune 500 company if you sound “suthren.”

  • Lilly Munster

    No…you are not the only person on the planet WHO still notices these things.  You are a WHO, not a THAT. 

  • Platitudinous Fresco

    Please spread the word regarding “laxadaisical.” 
    People have grown so lackadaisical with the misuse of that word that it’s now reached the point of 50-50 use/misuse…at best!

  • Bill Fisher

    Let’s not forget “meteoric rise.”  Meteors FALL.

  • Anonymous

    I know!  And don’t you also hate it when people pronounce “colonel” as if it has an “r” in it?

  • Mtkelley

    The absolute worst is when people say ‘if I would have (known, gone, done, etc., etc.)  It is so awful – the correct grammar is ‘If I HAD KNOWN, or HAD GONE or HAD SEEN, etc.  PLEASE pay attention!  This is so improper and it is lazy!!!!

  • Kirby8985

    a lot

  • Kirby8985

    a lot

  • David Doucet

    I expected the article to have more humor.  But, irregardless, it was informative!
    I’ll leave it up to all as to which word creates a sensation similar to running your fingernails down a blackboard!

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/TQHW7IVS6S7YD5S4SSPRYBW3UE Pontefractious

    It particularly irritates me to hear the word “reticent” used when the speaker really means “reluctant.” The two words are not synonyms. “Reticent” means reluctant to speak, as in “the politician was reticent about his recent love affair with his secretary.” You should not say “the boy was reticent about going to school” if what you really mean is “the boy was reluctant to go to school.” 

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/TQHW7IVS6S7YD5S4SSPRYBW3UE Pontefractious

    I accept that split infinitives should no longer be considered to be incorrect. Nevertheless, they  sound awkward to me and I am reluctant to split infinitives myself. I do not think this makes me a rigid pretentious English snob from the 19th century. 
    In the same vein, I no longer inveigh against those who use the recently (c 1976) invented “centennial” as in “bicentennial”. Centenary and bicentenary, which have been in the language for about 400 years, which are used in the UK, and which were in general use in the United States until the bicentenary of the War of Independence, seem adequate to me, but no-one can stand in the way of linguistic developments.

  • EarlGrayHot

    It makes me nutty to read “should of” instead of “should have.”

  • EarlGrayHot

    It makes me nutty to read “should of” instead of “should have.”

  • Editor/Momof3

    Since we’re on the subject, can we add that “irregardless” is not a word?

  • Editor/Momof3

    Since we’re on the subject, can we add that “irregardless” is not a word?

  • Dave

    “These ones”, when “these” is all you need.  ”On accident” instead of “by accident”.  And, of course, “a whole nother”, which is now either written into scripts or not caught by the director!

  • Dave

    “These ones”, when “these” is all you need.  ”On accident” instead of “by accident”.  And, of course, “a whole nother”, which is now either written into scripts or not caught by the director!

  • Dave

    “These ones”, when “these” is all you need.  ”On accident” instead of “by accident”.  And, of course, “a whole nother”, which is now either written into scripts or not caught by the director!

  • Dave

    “These ones”, when “these” is all you need.  ”On accident” instead of “by accident”.  And, of course, “a whole nother”, which is now either written into scripts or not caught by the director!

  • Nana

    “24 Things you might be saying wrong” is the best I have seen in a long time.  News, sportscasters and others in the media would do well to read and heed these rules of the language.  

  • Tjesster

    Umm, when I say “mano a mano”, I figuratively mean just that–that we are going to go toe to toe, hand to hand in battle over an issue. 

  • Tjesster

    “Begs the question” is not about a circular argument.  It is used to point out a flaw in an argument or train of thought.  “Begs the question” means that the flaw in the argument practically “begs” to be solved.  Sheesh.

  • Liz

    Um, hello.  Mano a mano means hand to hand, not man to man.

  • Liz

    Um, hello.  Mano a mano means hand to hand, not man to man.

  • Ann

     I am from the south. I pronounce it coo-pon. Maybe certain parts of the south pronounce it Qupon. I’m from Mississippi, raised in Florida, and have lived in Texas most of my adult life.

  • Ann

     I am from the south. I pronounce it coo-pon. Maybe certain parts of the south pronounce it Qupon. I’m from Mississippi, raised in Florida, and have lived in Texas most of my adult life.

  • Ann

     I may be wrong, but where I come from, you’re making a mistake on that one. Why would you “make a mistake,” but “take a decision”? This is probably an example of a regionalism; are you from England or some other country than the United States? I’ve never heard an American speak of “taking” a decision.

  • Ann

     I may be wrong, but where I come from, you’re making a mistake on that one. Why would you “make a mistake,” but “take a decision”? This is probably an example of a regionalism; are you from England or some other country than the United States? I’ve never heard an American speak of “taking” a decision.

  • Ann

     I may be wrong, but where I come from, you’re making a mistake on that one. Why would you “make a mistake,” but “take a decision”? This is probably an example of a regionalism; are you from England or some other country than the United States? I’ve never heard an American speak of “taking” a decision.

  • Ann

    Arizzo313, it depends on the sentence. Correct: “You are more talented than I” (am is understood). Incorrect: “They gave a party for Dan and I” (should be me). It’s true that the first sentence, which correctly ends with “I,” is correct, but sounds pretentious. Because of that, I usually add the understood “am.”

  • Teddyparker

    Here’s a popular one; I have to ” take a sh*t”

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000026718729 Doug Becker

    I live in Alaska, still a  part of the United States. ‘Decision’ is a word which comes from middle- French which means “to cut off”. Taking a decision is “choosing between” 2 or more options, nothing is ‘made’. 
    So, you can “form an opinion” leading you to “take a decision” and hope you do not “make a mistake” in so doing. 

  • Renee Sousa

    The phrase that gets on my nerves is ” Back in the day”.  What day?  In the last day?!?  In the previous day?!?  The prehistoric day?!?  Which day?!?

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/OAQ4XASGIPFIW3HP5NLBPRZAE4 eric z

    “The three presenters argued with one another over who should announce the award, but Ann and Barbara gave each other flowers after the ceremony.” — Shouldn’t you have used “whom”?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000026718729 Doug Becker

    How about Redundancies?

    “In one hour’s time”, rather than “in one hour”; an hour is a measurement of time and nothing else.
    Let’s look into his “past history”; All ‘history’ is in the ‘past’

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000026718729 Doug Becker

    Here is another one that I always notice: “comprised of” rather than “comprises” or “composed of”

  • Chrisshaner

     Your use of “region of it’s (sic) origin”  contains a misspelling of its.

  • ted

    wish you had mentioned the most egregious error of the word “myself” when “me” should be used.

  • Anonymous

    Here’s one I see written a lot: should of… Please people, it’s “should have.”

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000026718729 Doug Becker

    Or how about… 
    I, myself prefer the other one. 

  • Anonymous

    Is “preliminarily” a word?  Or should we use the word “preliminary” in the phrase.  I guess the same question could be asked of “momentarily” and “momentary”.

  • KV

    I’m glad to see a list that mentions the “hone in” abomination. My beef with it is that it doesn’t make any sense. “To home in on a beacon” makes sense, and so does “home in on a specific topic” — the phrase evokes a specific image. But anyone who knows what it means to hone a knife also knows there’s no way to “hone in on” a knife or anything else. 

  • KV

    I’m glad to see a list that mentions the “hone in” abomination. My beef with it is that it doesn’t make any sense. “To home in on a beacon” makes sense, and so does “home in on a specific topic” — the phrase evokes a specific image. But anyone who knows what it means to hone a knife also knows there’s no way to “hone in on” a knife or anything else. 

  • KV

    I’m glad to see a list that mentions the “hone in” abomination. My beef with it is that it doesn’t make any sense. “To home in on a beacon” makes sense, and so does “home in on a specific topic” — the phrase evokes a specific image. But anyone who knows what it means to hone a knife also knows there’s no way to “hone in on” a knife or anything else. 

  • Darstep1

    …bi-annual and semi-annual…
    bi-annual is every two years
    semi-annual is twice a year

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1075470008 Bronson Kyle

    Why isn’t welp listed. That word drives me insane. IT’S ‘WELL’ PEOPLE

  • Karl Bring

    So, you’re piqued.

  • Csimpson74

    Oh, I hate the double “is”.  I know exactly what you’re talking about and I’m making it my mission to come back here with an example.  Isn’t it funny how none comes to mind when you need it?  (None = Not one.  Singular, right?)

  • Csimpson74

    Oh, I hate the double “is”.  I know exactly what you’re talking about and I’m making it my mission to come back here with an example.  Isn’t it funny how none comes to mind when you need it?  (None = Not one.  Singular, right?)

  • Csimpson74

    According to McMillan and American Heritage dictionaries, there is no long “o” in kilometer and the emphasis is on the second syllable.  Just sayin’.

  • Csimpson74

    Relatively new pronunciations that I hope don’t “take”:

    coo-unt (couldn’t)
    di-unt (didn’t)

  • Plop plop

    A lot of people write “should of” instead of “should’ve”.

  • Plop plop

    A lot of people write “should of” instead of “should’ve”.

  • Csimpson74

    These embellishments grate on me.  And to show what a curmudgeon I am, “in my opinion” is overused.  In fact, exactly when is it useful?

    On a bad day, I’d even like to eliminate the expressions “obviously” and “no offense, but”.  Both say, “get ready to be insulted!”  But I digress.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000026718729 Doug Becker

    Here is one I heard on the national news today: “at this point in time”. 
    Can we just say “at this time” or “at this point”

  • Martinm31

    Actually there’s nothing wrong with “wrong.”  ”Wrong” can be an adverb or an adjective.  In the title, it’s being used as an adverb and is modifying the action of “saying.”  ”Incorrectly” would also be fine.  

  • Kenneth Silva

    Since we’re on the subject, here are my current pet peeves: If the personal pronoun you want to use, the poor apostrophe do not abuse. (Its vs. it’s.) There is no construction: America’s Got Talent or You’ve Got Mail. It’s America Has Talent and You Have Mail. (This one’s for you, Mrs. Helen Detsch, high school English teacher.) And finally, couple is not an adjective, it’s a noun. (I have a couple examples vs. I have a couple of examples. Do you remember the object of a preposition? Presently, I’ll post more. Currently means now, and presently means a little bit in the future. 

  • ed
  • http://www.hitherandyon.com/ Colin

    Funny title, great list!

  • teacher

     Where’s it at?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000026718729 Doug Becker

    Behind the “at”!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000026718729 Doug Becker

    Behind the “at”!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000026718729 Doug Becker

    “Past History” Isn’t all history in the past? 

  • Noneya

    Add “wrong” from your article title. It should be “incorrectly.”

  • Pokerpoodle

    You hear this all the time, but if the word “myself” is used, there must be a refering pronoun. It is okay to say,  “I, myself, believe in ghosts.”  It in not okay to say, “Sue and myself believe in ghosts.”

  • Pokerpoodle

    You hear this all the time, but if the word “myself” is used, there must be a refering pronoun. It is okay to say,  “I, myself, believe in ghosts.”  It in not okay to say, “Sue and myself believe in ghosts.”

  • guest

    Is the title “wrong”?  The dictionary says “wrong” is an adjective, an adverb, a noun and a transitive verb.  So might the adverb “wrong” modify the verb “be saying”.

    Let’s here from a grammar teacher.

  • guest

    Edit:  

    So might not the adverb “wrong” modify the verb “be saying”?

    (And of course I meant “hear”).

  • Daniel B

    The ‘s’ going in the middle of dashed phrases is silly because a “brother-in-law” is one complete concept that is being pluralized.  Each other / one another is really silly because it’s just “tradition”, not a real rule (much like not ending sentences with prepositions).

  • Michael

    One of the most misused expressions is “just between you and I…”. The easy rule of thumb is to reverse the person, to instantly recognize the mistake. “Between I and you” sounds wrong. The proper way is “between you and me” because…”between me and you” still sounds correct!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1242055817 Karen Johnston

    you never mean:  phrases you might be saying wrong

    you always mean:  phrases you might be saying incorrectly   

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1242055817 Karen Johnston

    you never mean:  phrases you might be saying wrong

    you always mean:  phrases you might be saying incorrectly