What Are GMO Foods, and Are They Dangerous?

Are genetically modified "Frankenfoods" harmful to consumers or do they help build our food supply? Expert Chris Woolston weighs in on the food fight.

Adam Voorhes

The loudest public food fight right now is about GMOs, or genetically modified organisms. Scientists add genes to corn, soybeans, and other plants, usually to protect the crops from insects or herbicides.

Proponents say the genetic tinkering makes crops easier to grow and cheaper. But many consumers and food-safety watchdogs worry that GMOs pose an unnatural threat to our health and the environment. Opponents say that GMOs have been linked to depression, allergies, infertility, and even cancer.

Although GMOs have been in our food supply for 20 years, the controversy has moved to center stage. Recent documentaries and experts on The Doctor Oz Show have fanned the flames. About 75 percent of consumers say they are concerned about the safety of genetically modified foods, according to a New York Times survey. Maine and Connecticut recently passed bills requiring labeling of all foods made with GMOs; many other states are considering mandatory labeling. The European Union already requires labeling, and several countries, including France, have banned the planting of genetically modified crops. So are GMOs safe—or should you avoid them at all costs? Here, a look at the evidence.

What You’ve Heard
Roughly 90 percent of the corn, canola, soybeans, and sugar beets grown in this country have bits of DNA that originally came from a lab. The soy in some multigrain breads, the canola in margarine, and the corn syrup in everything from ketchup to soda are likely genetically modified. Unless you’ve been eating only foods labeled 100 percent organic—which must be GMO-free—you probably have GMOs in your system now.

In a big red-flag–raising study, French researchers reported last year in Food and Chemical Toxicology that rats developed huge tumors after living on genetically modified corn for two years. “Genetic engineering can have unintended consequences,” says Bill Freese, science policy analyst for the Center for Food Safety. Artificial genes force plants to produce unnatural proteins, he says, and no one knows how those may affect human health.

… But Not So Fast
Scientists immediately criticized the French study (and it was ultimately retracted by the journal in November 2013.) For one thing, the types of rats used in the study were highly prone to cancer, so it was predictable that some would develop tumors after eating GMOs, notes Nina Fedoroff, a professor of biology and life sciences at Penn State University. She adds, “We’ve eaten these foods for 20 years and aren’t walking around with giant tumors.”

Hundreds of other studies have found no trouble with GMOs, says Ruth MacDonald, professor and chair of food science at Iowa State University. After looking at more than 130 research projects—including animal studies and searches for known toxins or allergens in GMO foods—the European Union concluded that there’s nothing especially risky about them.

In September, the editors of Scientific American denounced the efforts to label GMO foods, stating that there’s no proof that so-called Frankenfoods can endanger people’s health. Adding genes to crops isn’t any more dangerous than traditional breeding, which farmers have done for thousands of years, the American Association for the Advancement of Science declared in 2012. Old methods of modifying crops mixed tens of thousands of genes with unpredictable results. The fact that scientists can now insert single genes into corn or soybeans shouldn’t raise any new alarms, says Fedoroff.

The Bottom Line
There doesn’t appear to be a scientific reason to ban GMO foods from your pantry to protect your health. But it is healthy to limit your intake of the processed foods that often contain them. And don’t assume that GMO-free packaged food is necessarily healthy. Organic cookies can still contain too much sugar or salt.

Want to stay smart and healthy?

Get our weekly Health Reads newsletter

how we use your e-mail
We will use your email address to send you the newsletter each week, and we may also send you occasional special offers from Reader's Digest. For more information please read our privacy policy.

7 thoughts on “What Are GMO Foods, and Are They Dangerous?

  1. yeah, and lead in gas was a great idea and glass in macadam was going to make roads last forever. I like the long road to progressive food production – they also still have hundreds of chemicals in foods that are hurting many people sensitive to them, or just the general population in general – kinda like margarine being forced on everyone, esp doctors. now we have nano technology invading our food chain, sometimes just to make yogurt and milk products whiter!!! metals are being incorporated into our foods, and once again, most the population is ignorant of this added step in our foods! plus, making GMO impervious to pesticides means a produce bathed in pesticides is being consumed by the population – the arrogance and ignorance of making the population lab rats in a food experiment for profit is obscene and unforgivable. I want full disclosure on all the food ingredients and processes used – I trust no manufacturer, and even fresh produce any longer. We are all chumps if we do not demand full disclosure, and preserve our right to be fully informed as well as preserving our right to choose with our dollars and daily health concerns. welcome to the 21st century and men who love playing gods for profit. Food is sacred and pure – stop screwing with mother nature in such an unnatural way – have we learned nothing from all the other follies? Are all our rights and dignities to be trampled on in such a covert and manipulative way? We all will be responsible for being irresponsible, one way or another.

  2. I worked with Sprague-Dawley rats when I was working in toxicology. They seem to get cancer by walking across the room. I have seen data where dimes apparently gave them cancer, as did distilled water. I wouldn’t trust any cancer data from studies that used Sprague-Dawley rate.

    Mary Shelley, James Whale, and the Hammer brothers have a lot to answer for.

  3. It is misleading to label GMOs as synthetic because there is nothing synthetic about the genes being inserted or its product/s. These genes are specifically selected and targeted for insertion from another same or different organism because prior knowledge of their biological importance is known. It would help to know that more than 8% of human genome consists of viral DNA, accumulated over millions of years of evolution enabling us to exist, yet we don’t feel so synthetic. GMOs are made to serve mankind, not to harm. So, scientifically validated GMOs, esp. crops, should not be persecuted based on mere prognostic fears.

    1. Oh Benz…where to start? I think your “millions of years” timeframe while relating to humans is a bit off. Secondly, anything put out by a company in the business of producing toxic chemicals for the purpose of killing does not have mankind’s best interest at heart. Finally, there is NO…let me repreat that, NO “scientific validation” of GMO crops. Food, humans, and the planet have all existed quite well without the existence of Monsanto. After you go collect your check, (as I cannot see how any reasonable human who isn’t being paid by Monsanto to spread disinformation could so recklessly spew this bile), perhaps Karl and yourself can go down to starbuck’s (preferably one right next to a fracking well head) and enjoy some fine GMO-laden lattes and discuss your crazy ideas. Karl, and you a german…smh

  4. I love it when they say “there’s no proof” that something is dangerous. They have not convinced me that it isn’t dangerous.

    1. You probably don’t know enough formal logic to realize it is impossible to prove a positive. To prove a negative, all you need is one case. To prove a positive, you need to prove any and all possible cases. So, you need to buy only “organic” food, or imagine that what you see at the grocers is not GMO.

  5. If the GMO corn were grown without Roundup, that would be fine. But the Roundup is sprayed on the corn and gets in the kernels. The corn might be okay, but the Roundup in it is poison.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Funny Jokes

Some people like to travel by train because 
it combines the slowness of a car with the cramped public exposure of 
an airplane.

Dennis Miller

Funny Jokes

I think my pilot was a little inexperienced. We were sitting on the runway, and he said, “OK, folks, we’re gonna be taking off in a just few—whoa! Here we go.”

Kevin Nealon

Funny Jokes

“I can’t wait until your vacation is over.” 
—Everyone following you on Instagram


Funny Jokes

A man knocked on my door and asked for a donation toward the local swimming pool. So I gave him a glass of water.

Comedian Greg Davies

Funny Jokes

Just found the worst page in the entire dictionary. What I saw was disgraceful, disgusting, dishonest, and disingenuous.


Funny Jokes

Client: We need you to log in to the YouTube and make all our company videos viral.

From clientsfromhell.net

Funny Jokes

My cat just walked up to the paper shredder and said, “Teach me 
everything you know.”


Funny Jokes

“Just because you can’t dance doesn’t mean you shouldn’t dance.” 

@yoyoha (Josh Hara)

Funny Jokes

My parents didn’t want to move to Florida, but they turned 60 and that’s the law.

—Jerry Seinfeld

Funny Jokes

Q: What do you call an Amish guy with his hand in a horse’s mouth?

A: A mechanic.

Fields marked with an * are required
Foods That Harm Foods That HealWant a Free eBook?
FOODS THAT HARM, FOODS THAT HEAL offers important information about the role diet plays in the struggle against heart disease, cancer, diabetes and other serious illnesses. Answer the question below to receive your FREE digital eBook.

Someone in my household experiences the following conditions:

Send me a link to download FOODS THAT HARM, FOODS THAT HEAL:
By clicking below, I agree to the Trusted Media Brands Privacy Policy