That's Outrageous! Caught Cheating

Cheating is becoming a problem in schools across the country ... and teachers are the culprits.

Advertisement
 
Caught Cheating in School
PHOTO- ILLUSTRATION BY LOU BEACH
It started with grade inflation. Now it’s fraud.
Image
It's more prevalent than anyone wants to admit

The Pressure's On

In 2005, every single fourth- and sixth-grade student at City Day Community School in Dayton, Ohio, flunked the math portion of a statewide assessment test. That landed City Day an "academic emergency" rating, meaning state intervention or even takeover. But 2006 brought a stunning turnaround: 100 percent of the school's seventh-grade class, and 59 percent of its fifth graders, passed. Same test, same kids. It seemed too good to be true—and it was.

A few months later, the Dayton Daily News reported that 44 questions on a practice test were nearly identical to the ones in the state test the kids took a week later. When proctors came in to monitor the next year's tests, scores plummeted.

Clearly there was massive cheating at City Day. But the students didn't rig the tests—the teachers did the dirty work. (The school's superintendent denied the charges but was later fired.)

Cheating among teachers has become epidemic in America's schools, with cases from New York to California, Florida to South Dakota, Tennessee to Maryland. "It's more prevalent than anyone wants to admit," says UNC-Chapel Hill professor Gregory Cizek, an expert on cheating in schools. "Teachers are paid to be role models. It sends a really destructive message to kids."

Many experts say this disgraceful behavior has surged due to the 2001 No Child Left Behind law, which annually tests academic performance and can punish struggling schools that don't show improvement. Feeling this heat, some teachers resort to showing students test questions in advance or—if you can believe it—changing their answers after the fact.

Of course, the vast majority of teachers would never dream of cheating, but "when tests are all that matter, teachers feel pressure to boost scores, and some people cross the ethical line," says Robert Schaeffer of FairTest, a group opposed to standardized testing. Cheaters are siphoning off taxpayer dollars meant to reward the real achievers.

That was the infuriating story at Houston's Forest Brook High School. The governor awarded the low-income neighborhood school $165,000 for its rising test scores in 2006. But soon after, a Dallas Morning News exposé found strong evidence of organized cheating in dozens of schools and suspicious results in hundreds more.

Texas hired a firm to audit the results, and Forest Brook was among the most suspected of organized cheating. No wrongdoing was ever proved, but when last year's testing was monitored by outsiders, scores at Forest Brook sank like a rock. In California, another newspaper investigation found that teachers had encouraged cheating in more than 120 schools over the previous three years by letting kids use calculators and maps during tests.

One of the worst cases occurred in Uniondale, New York, where hundreds of tests were systematically changed after they were handed in. It was so bad, the state simply threw out the entire year's test results.

Administrators, too, have a lot to answer for when they look the other way. After fourth-grade math test scores in a Camden, New Jersey, school soared from rock-bottom to best in the state, no one asked why. Except The Philadelphia Inquirer, whose report led to an investigation that found "adult interference" had boosted scores.

With money and jobs at stake, the pressure is on. And anyone who raises a red flag is at risk. The former principal of Dayton's City Day says he was fired a day after questioning the test scores.

Analyzing tests from two years ago, an outside firm flagged suspicious test results in 700 Texas schools. Most schools were cleared, though the state did acknowledge problems at some (two are confirmed, and seven are still under investigation). But in the tradition of the fox guarding the henhouse, its conclusion was based mostly on assurances from the same school officials who might be held accountable. So it's not surprising The Dallas Morning News found that more than 350 answer sheets had suspicious answer patterns.
Must Read Should Everyone Read This? Yes! I vote for this story
Share Your Comments
 
Remaining Character Count:
 
continued from next 3 comments: for every student no matter what level they start out at, salaries for teachers commensurate with their education level and responsibilities, and adequate funding for teacher training and special education programs to achieve these goals. Thank you, Kelle L. Gibbs M.A. CCC-SLP Rineyville, KY

By kgibbs, on 10/28/2008

This and the next two comments are all from one letter: Strangely, opposition to NCLB seems to have stalled and teachers and school systems are now focusing on how the impossible can be done. If any cheating has occurred, be assured that it is not because of a sudden increase in unscrupulous teachers. The absurdity of NCLB and the relentless pressure have consequences. How much more reasonable it would be to expect proficiency at achievable levels and without state variances, academic gains for every student no matter what level they start out at, salaries for teachers commensurate with their education level and responsibilities, and adequate funding for teacher training and special education programs to achieve these goals. Thank you, Kelle L. Gibbs M.A. CCC-SLP Rineyville, KY

By kgibbs, on 10/28/2008

The root of the problem is the No Child Left Behind (NLCB) act. Though briefly mentioned in the article, it is quickly dismissed and not thoroughly explained. The intent of NLCB legislation was that all children be proficient at their grade level. Unfortunately, little provision was made for students with disabilities and levels of proficiency vary from state to state. All except those students with severe delays are factored into the equation determining if a school has attained annual yearly progress (AYP). Schools that fail to meet AYP will be subject to loss of funding. Administrators, faced with the prospect of less revenue (which would further cut already sparse programs) place incredible pressure on teachers to ensure that students score well on these tests. The result is that learning is no longer focused on developing a child’s skills required for analysis and future learning, but rather on taking the test.

By kgibbs, on 10/28/2008

See All Comments
  • Most Popular
  • How to Finish a Basement: Framing and Insulating
    How to frame a basement and install insulation.
  • 6 Delicious Christmas Cookie Recipes
    Bake a batch of any of these easy to follow recipes or just drool over the stunning Christmas cookie pictures.
  • Spinach, Pear, and Shaved Parmesan Salad
    A spinach salad, especially one with ripe fall pears, is a welcome addition to the Thanksgiving table. The salad can be served in a large bowl as part of a buffet, or on individual salad plates alongside the main course.
  • Delicata Squash Soup with Parmesan Croutons
    Delicata squash, as its name implies, is a finely flavored, richly sweet winter squash with a nearly fibreless flesh. Cylindrical in shape, with elongated ridges, this squash has yellow to pale orange skin with green striations. Its beautiful yellow flesh and delicate flavor make it perfect for this puréed soup.
  • Thanksgiving Desserts
    It will be difficult to wait until the end of the meal for these gorgeous desserts.

Advertisement
 
Related Links

Advertisement
Popular stories from the source site rd.com sorted by diggs