Cindy McCain Interview: A Hero's Heart

Agree with jeffer. I chose to read this article over several others because I had this expectation of RD to do these personality sketches in a fair manner. I was very disappointed. If RD was hard up looking for unbiased writers, it could have at least gotten a pro-Obama to write on Michelle and a pro-McCain to write on Cindy. Instead, it gets unabashed pro-Obamas to paint a Monalisa of Michelle and to trash Cindy.

A wonderful Lady and the kind of Lady that should be in the White House representing America! She has ALWAYS been proud of her country and her sincere and honest husband! COUNTRY FIRST

After reading the articles in RD and then seeing the photo gallery online, my suspicions are not incorrect. The author's bias is very evident. I, too, will not renew my subscription to RD because of their lack of oversight to the writer's prejudicial slant.

clearly biased onesided Cindy McCain article that went to great lenght to portray her only as a pampered women with "silklined armor, flawless hair and make up" who was a rodeo queen that took ballet lesson, inherited a multimillion dollar business and charges $500,000 on her AMEX card. Not feeling the need to name the CEO of the company it didn't go unreported that the CFO was her step son. Sad the editor didn't send the biased writer back to her typewriter for real reporting.

Anyone who would use Dr. Phil to champion their view of familial fielty should wonder why the good doctor's wife is no longer walking beside him and holding his hand when his "show" ends. Haven't you heard about his "solid" marriage falling apart???

The "unbiased" (not!) articles on Michelle and Cindy causes me to believe the writer invited friends and supporters of Obama to come and post their equally "unbiased" opinions. It has happened on other blogs. Obama supporters try to disrupt McCain supporters in the blogs. It is part of a concerted plan. If RD does not make sure this does not happen in the future, it will affect RD's readership. RD has a tradition for being unbiased and this should not change.

After seeing the "unbiased" article (not!), I must conclude that the writer has no doubt alerted fans and supporters to come into this blog and post supporting comments pro-Michelle and anti-Cindy. I've seen these antics before. RD needs to reassess the magazine's appearance to readers and decide if it wants to keep this course. If this is not done, in the long run it will just hurt the magazine.

I found Cindy McCain to be refreshingly open and honest.

I find cindy mccain to be refreshingly honest and candid.

i cant vote for a man whos' wife spends so freely on clothes,in such bad times,and people have nothing,homes and so forth..i say shame on you cindy!