America's Dumbest Lawsuits (page 2 of 2)

Advertisement
 
Image

Just Desserts
Prison, it turns out, is a great place to learn about tort law. Three inmates from the Kane County Jail in Illinois sued the county sheriff and Aramark food services in 2007 for supplying prisoners with subpar food, including soggy cookies and cakes. The $2 million they sought would buy them a nice drying rack for their desserts.

Disposition: No Mrs. Fields for these prisoners—the judge dismissed the case.

Blonde Ambition
Charlotte Feeney says blondes have more fun, and that's why she sued cosmetics giant L'Oréal for $15,000. Feeney insisted her life was ruined when she accidentally touched up her naturally flaxen locks with brown dye from a mislabeled box.

"I was sick to my stomach," she said in an affidavit. "I have a bad hair day every day. I had headaches. I don't like myself. I stay home more than ever in my life. I wear hats most of the time." What's more, she told her doctor that she doesn't know how to dress now that she's no longer a blonde—one reason her doctor prescribed medication to treat anxiety and depression.

So why didn't she dye her hair blonde and wait for her natural color to grow back? Who knows, but the real question is, What's wrong with being a raven-haired beauty? "Blondes get more attention than brunettes," she said. "Emotionally, I miss that."

Disposition: No doubt an Audrey Hepburn fan, the judge dismissed the suit last October, ruling that Feeney never proved that L'Oréal was to blame for the mix-up.

ePay Up
Ask Steve Shellhorn and he'll probably tell you that if you have nothing nice to say about someone, lie. Shellhorn, a Seattle native, bought coins on eBay from Charles Burgess, who then asked for feedback, a regular practice on the site. Was the service good or bad? Shellhorn was torn. The Morgan silver dollars were in fine shape, and the price was fair. But the packaging left a lot to be desired.

"The coins were hanging out of the envelope," he later told Seattle's King 5 News. There should have been proper packing to keep them in place. With that in mind, Shellhorn left neutral feedback, neither good nor bad.

The lukewarm response got a hot one from Burgess. Charging "fraud" and "extortion," he sued Shellhorn for $10,000 over his "childish and vindictive" behavior, which, he feared, could harm future sales.

Disposition: Misery loves company, and Shellhorn had plenty. It turns out that Burgess made it a habit to go after less-than-thrilled customers. The judge sided with Shellhorn but not before he'd spent $500 for an attorney.

Suing in the Rain
You may recall the Washington, D.C., judge who, two years ago, filed a $67 million lawsuit against a dry cleaner for allegedly losing a pair of his pants. Now, in that fine tradition, comes Nello Balan, who sued a Rothschild and a supermodel for $1 million over the loss of an umbrella.

It all began on April 25, 2007, when a model named Le Call dined at Balan's Manhattan restaurant, Nello. When she left, it was raining. Since supermodels have been known to wither in such conditions, the restaurateur kindly lent her an umbrella. Not the cheap kind, manufactured to break at first gust. No, this one was leather. A gift from fashion designer Jean Paul Gaultier, it was valued at $5,000.

Cut to a month later, and the umbrella is AWOL. A quick call to Le Call revealed that she'd lent it to Nathaniel Rothschild, the future fifth Baron Rothschild. But when Rothschild's chauffeur returned the umbrella, it was in two pieces, matching Balan's emotional state upon seeing his beloved umbrella.

Disposition: Balan eventually lowered his demand to $30,000. But even that was too much for the judge, who tossed water on the umbrella suit and fined Balan's lawyer $500 for filing a frivolous claim.

From Reader's Digest - May 2009
 
Must Read Should Everyone Read This? Yes! I vote for this story
Share Your Comments
 
Remaining Character Count:
 
When I worked at Wallmart A lady sued us when she slipped on her own french fry. They had it on camera and still wallmart lost the case

By misipo, on 04/29/2009

bahaha! people are so pathetic... anything for attention these days, eh?

By bgarden, on 04/13/2009

4X as many corp vs personal lawsuits in 04’—in 07' a dozen rulings made it harder to sue corporations or limited lawsuit damages. Courts allow corporations looking to settle also seal court records from the public, hiding from the public damages to health, safety and environment. Why does RD report only on the idiocy of frivolous lawsuits, especially when every example ended with the case being thrown out? Fine lawyers for wasting court time, but the article is limited and dare I say, bias.

By shawman, on 04/13/2009

See All Comments

Advertisement
 
Related Links

Advertisement
Popular stories from the source site rd.com sorted by diggs