Quick Study: The Facts on Nuclear Energy (page 2 of 3)

Advertisement
 

Images from this article
DAN LAMONT/CORBIS
In 1987, Congress authorized national nuclear-waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, set to start in 1998. Nevada uses no nuclear energy.
javascript:void(0);
ILLUSTRATED BY KEVIN JOHNSTON; SOURCE: DOE/EIA ELECTRIC POWER ANNUAL 2005
Most nuclear energy is generated and used in the eastern half of the United States. The proposed repository for spent fuel is Nevada, a state that uses no nuclear energy.
javascript:void(0);
Another way to store fuel: Dry casks on-site mean no transport.
javascript:void(0);
COLUMBIA/THE KOBAL
In 1979, The China Syndrome (Jane Fonda, Michael Douglas), about lax safety at nuclear power plants, was released.
javascript:void(0);
Nuclear Power Plant Locations in the U.S.
ILLUSTRATED BY KEVIN JOHNSTON; SOURCE: DOE/EIA ELECTRIC POWER ANNUAL 2005
Most nuclear energy is generated and used in the eastern half of the United States. The proposed repository for spent fuel is Nevada, a state that uses no nuclear energy.
Image Image Image Image

Nuclear Energy Controversy

Sabotage or accidents -- Spent fuel is now stored on-site at nuclear plants. If the containers holding this radioactive material were to lose their coolant, land could be contaminated for hundreds of miles. If an operating reactor lost its coolant, thousands could die from acute radiation within days or weeks, and tens of thousands could die from cancer in the long term. There are 161 million Americans living within 75 miles of the Department of Energy's 121 nuclear-waste storage sites.

Meltdown -- On March 28, 1979, the cooling system at Three Mile Island malfunctioned. Within hours, the core of the overheated plant essentially melted. Remarkably, no one was hurt.

Explosions -- Chernobyl, the reactor in the then-Soviet Union (now Ukraine), experienced a power surge and explosions in April 1986. A botched test caused the accident that killed dozens and sentenced thousands to cancer after they were exposed to radiation.

Health -- New research has linked living near a nuclear plant to childhood leukemia.

Nuclear holocaust -- Critics fear that the countries now seeking nuclear energy capabilities, including Iran, are just looking for the back door to nuclear bombs. Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad announced in January that his country would bring a nuclear plant online by 2009. These same critics also point to the terrorist threat posed by transporting nuclear waste, now stored at dozens of sites, to a new centralized repository like the one planned for Yucca Mountain.

Forward Thinking

Snazzier reactors -- The next generation of nuclear reactors are simpler and, according to the industry, less prone to meltdown because they rely on natural processes like gravity and evaporation instead of big valves and pumps manned by human beings. So far, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has certified four new reactor designs and is reviewing an additional four.

Recycling -- A pipe dream in the United States even a few years ago, the goal of recycling spent nuclear fuel has today been embraced by the Bush Administration, which in 2006 made recycling the centerpiece of its Global Nuclear Energy Partnership. GNEP countries would provide nuclear fuel to developing nations, who in return would promise not to generate their own. Spent fuel would be reprocessed so that weapons-grade plutonium is kept out of dangerous hands. The GNEP aims to advance recycling and reactor technologies.

Central dumping ground -- Opponents of a centralized, underground repository for high-level nuclear waste argue that Yucca Mountain is too close to Las Vegas (90 miles) and an earthquake fault line. And transporting waste cross-country, they say, could create "mobile Chernobyls."

Another way to store spent nuclear fuel: Dry casks on-site mean no transport.

Arguments for Nuclear Power

'We're in the early stages of a renaissance for nuclear energy. Just look at the numbers. Nuclear energy is reliable and affordable, and it's a carbon-free energy source.'
Steven Kerekes, spokesman, Nuclear Energy Institute

"What the nuclear industry is selling as the 'nuclear renaissance' has the same problems that plagued the industry from the start: safety, security, no place to put radioactive waste, lack of skilled engineers and craft labor, cost of materials, weak supply chains, cost of capital, and lack of investors."
Jon Block, formerly of the Union of Concerned Scientists

"Some environmentalists are still stuck in the 1970s, [when we feared] being fried by nuclear weapons. Nuclear energy is simply the only nonpolluting energy source that can replace fossil fuels. It's a fairy tale that wind and solar can do the job."
Patrick Moore, cochair, Clean and Safe Energy Coalition (CASEnergy) and cofounder of Greenpeace

"Today's reactor designs are safer than before. But they're costly, and we don't have very good regulatory enforcement. We're creating proliferation risks and kicking them down the road to our children."
Arjun Makhijani, author and president, Institute for Energy and Environmental Research
Must Read Should Everyone Read This? Yes! I vote for this story
Share Your Comments
 
Remaining Character Count:
 
A separate note about nuclear energy in America..Ted Kennedy has killed more people than any nuclear plant in the USA in the last 60 years.

By Craig P Campbell , on 08/17/2009

This is an add-on from the 'wasting our money department'. In Nevada there is a $10,000,000.00 nuclear waste storage facility . It is completed and could be used today. There is a complete compliment of personnel ,computer run trams to move material , climate controlled and fully functioning. Open every day. But NO storage to date. Why? The Nevada senator who pushed it through congress and no doubt made money for himself and is henchmen now will not let any spent material be stored there....

By Craig P Campbell , on 08/17/2009

Nuclear energy is NOT clean, it's carcinogenic by-products harm and often KILL human beings. ANY use of nuclear technology is extremely dangerous. Not only is nuclear waste a contributor to global warming but also poses the threat of providing potential targets for terrorist attack! This article was one-sided, completely inaccurate and ridiculous! Arjun Makhijani does NOT support nuclear power. www.ieer.org also see books written by Helen Caldicott for the TRUTH! INFORM YOURSELVES PEOPLE!!!

By TaraAlyce, on 10/09/2008

See All Comments

Advertisement
 
Related Links

Advertisement
Popular stories from the source site rd.com sorted by diggs