Our Interview with Sen. John McCain (page 4 of 5)

Advertisement
 
Image

More Scars Than Frankenstein

RD: Back to this question that I asked before: You made a persuasive case for why you're a better candidate in 2008 than you were in 2000, but how are you going to answer the question when people say, "I just think he's too old?"
McCain: I think I would say that I'm older than dirt. That I have more scars than Frankenstein. That I've learned a few things along the way. Anyone who has accompanied me in the two months before the last election, or while I was hiking in the Grand Canyon or doing many of the things that I do regularly, can attest to the fact that I'm capable of keeping a very rigorous schedule.

RD: Another thing being analyzed is whether Senator McCain can stay true to his compass -- and still appeal to the base support that he needs to get the nomination. The suggestion that he'd shift his position on ...
McCain: I have shifted no position. I've always said I believe in a "big tent" Republican Party and that we have to allow people of different views on specific issues to be in our party. But my 24-year voting record is a consistent, conservative voting record. Socially, fiscally and militarily, I am a conservative. As I said, whether it's concerns on national security, social issues or fiscal and economic issues, I have a clear record. I have not deviated.

If there's one issue that I think I'm open to some criticism on it is ethanol. When oil was $10 a barrel or less, I didn't support ethanol. And I still don't support the subsidies. But with the increase in climate change, and oil staying at $50, $60, $70 a barrel or more, then ethanol makes a lot of sense, in my mind. But I still don't support the subsidies. I think it can exist without 'em. So could you view that as a change in position? Yeah, but I think it's a justified change.

RD: How about the Bush Administration tax cuts?
McCain: The reason I opposed the tax cuts is that I saw no restraint on spending. Unfortunately, my concerns turned out to be legitimate: Spending lurched completely out of control. By the way, I think one of the reasons why Republicans lost the last election is because our fiscally conservative base became disenchanted. But then when the tax cuts came up for renewal, obviously I was not going to vote for what would be tantamount to a tax increase. So, that was my reason.

Must Read Should Everyone Read This? Yes! I vote for this story
Share Your Comments
 
Remaining Character Count:
 
See All Comments

Advertisement
 
Related Topics
Related Links

When it comes to Election Day, what kind of research do you do on candidates?


Advertisement
Popular stories from the source site rd.com sorted by diggs