Among vs. Between: What’s the Difference?
What's a small grammatical difference among friends! Or is it something different when it's between friends?
Right now, we’re in a world of comparisons and differences—political, geographical, and even interpersonal. Theodore Roosevelt truly believed that “comparison is the thief of joy,”. So, if that’s true, we should at least be able to find some joy in understanding how to compare things correctly. Or, more accurately, how to discuss the relationship between or among people. Speaking of, is there a difference between those two words, or it is just another pair among the sea of the common word pairs that everyone confuses?
In the case of among vs. between, the question becomes which one is okay to use in each specific circumstance. But is there some hidden difference between the two or perhaps just an ill-deserved air of elitism when you say amongst? Just like further and farther (which do have different usages after all!)—have you been using them wrong this whole time?
The etymology of between and among
To start at the very beginning, the Merriam-Webster dictionary states that both words come from Old English. Among came first from “gemonge” meaning “in a crowd” or “to mingle or mix.” Between, on the other hand, came a little later from the word “twā,” meaning “two.”
This is likely the reason many believe that between is only used for situations with two points of comparison, i.e. “Between you and I” or “I’m caught between two worlds.” However, if you delve deeper into the history of the word, between used to function just like among in that it could refer to multiple objects. Merriam-Webster also states that some Biblical scholars argue that between was used in descriptions of happenings within, or between, the many Apostles. Take a look at these other similar sounding words that even the smartest among us often mess up.
What’s the difference in usage?
If you were surprised by the fact that between wasn’t always only considered when referring to two people or things, you’re not alone. Many people still believe it sounds wrong to use it when referring to a large group. For some, the distinction comes naturally from the usage rules. The largest difference between among and between is the specificity and similarity between the objects in question, though there is some colloquial overlap. Sometimes our preconceived notions can lead us astray, like these words that don’t mean what you think they mean.
For among (or amongst, both are accurate though the latter is slightly more old-fashioned) is used to in cases where the two or more objects are “collectively or imprecisely” related. For instance, if you were to say, “There is no hope among these people,” you’d be referring to the group at large and their common link. If you were to say “There is no hope between these people,” it seems that the people are without hope in their fellow man.
Between is used when the objects are “individual and usually equal entities.” This means that the objects are similar in some ways, but not able to be grouped together in the way that among allows. For instance, you might say “between a rock and a hard place” while you wouldn’t say “sitting among a rock and a hard place” unless you were describing a larger environment or items grouped together to describe something else.
For many native English speakers, this distinction is known by ear and occurs naturally. Breaking it down to the rule itself can seem counterintuitive.
Examples of between:
- “I’m still choosing between the salad and the french fries.”
- “Last I checked, your son was still living between Texas and California.”
- “Between you and me, I never trusted Michael. Not as far as I can throw him!”
Examples of among:
- “Come on bartender! What’s a bar tab among friends?”
- “I feel reborn, sitting here among the flowers and birds.”
- “Figure it out amongst yourselves, you selfish monsters!”
Next, check out the difference between these easily confused homophones.