13 Reasons Queen Elizabeth II Will Never Give Up the Throne
Elizabeth II became the Queen of England in 1952, and if anyone’s taking bets on if and when she might abdicate the throne to Prince Charles (or Prince William, if Prince Charles were unavailable to serve), we’re all in with: No, and never. Here’s why.
Last year, The Daily Mail floated a titillating headline asking, “Is the Queen Preparing to Abdicate?” As it turns out, the story was really about rumors the Queen plans to appoint Prince Charles as “Prince Regent” when she turns 95, however, British history makes clear that appointing a regent is not equal to abdicating. Further, the Queen isn’t even legally empowered to appoint a regent, which happens only under very specific circumstances as outlined in the Regency Act of 1937. Find out the current line of succession to the British crown.
Abdicating due to age just isn’t done
While some royal families have a tradition of monarchs stepping down after he or she reaches a certain age (such as the royal family of the Netherlands), there’s no such tradition in the United Kingdom. In fact, abdication has been said to go against informal rules of the monarchy’s set-up. Indeed, it was considered a constitutional crisis when Prince Edward VIII abdicated in 1936 to marry Wallis Simpson.
Queen Elizabeth II promised she’d reign for life
On her 21st birthday, Queen Elizabeth II promised England she’d be their Queen for life. “I declare before you all that my whole life whether it be long or short shall be devoted to your service and the service of our great imperial family to which we all belong,” she said. That’s a big promise, but she’s kept to it for going on 67 years now. Here are some fascinating facts about the Queen you won’t want to miss.
She feels it’s her duty to reign
Experts on the monarch such as Sarah Bradford, author of Queen Elizabeth II: Her Life in Our Times, confirm the Queen feels that reigning is her life’s mission and duty. “She’s never even contemplated abdication,” Bradford told The Week. Here are some myths about the royal family that it’s time to stop believing.
The people don’t want her to abdicate
A long time ago, the people might have supported the Queen’s abdicating. That was back before Prince Charles and Princess Diana’s marriage imploded for all to see, says The Week. “It wasn’t until the end of the 1990s that the Prince’s reputation began to pull out of its nosedive.” However, public support of the Queen’s turning the throne over to the Prince of Wales has not risen significantly. Recent surveys show that a full 70 percent of the United Kingdom would prefer the Queen remain in power for as long as she lives.
The public’s love for the Queen does not equal the public’s love for the monarchy. So while the public would like to see Queen Elizabeth II remain Queen for her lifetime, they may not necessarily wish to replace her with another monarch. As The Guardian’s Polly Toynbee writes, “Let [Queen Elizabeth II] reign as long as she lives. But let her be Elizabeth the Last.” It is hard to imagine the Queen would hand the reigns over amid such sentiment.
The whole Charles thing
Even if the public were in favor of putting a new monarch on the throne, Prince Charles is next in line, and that’s considered problematic. “We know far too much about his foibles and past errors to revere him as we revere his mother,” writes The Daily Mail‘s Allison Pearson. In addition, people have their doubts about the ability of Prince Charles to maintain the requisite royal neutrality on certain political issues. While the Queen could abdicate in favor of Prince William, there is no historical precedent for passing over the current Prince of Wales (the traditional “on-deck” role) in favor of his child. Take a look at these candid, rarely seen photos of the royal family.
Plus, Charles is already 70
Even if the Queen was to abdicate due to her age, the Prince of Wales is already in his 70s. And in the opinion of some palace insiders, including Paul Burrell, former butler of Princess Diana, the public perceives Prince Charles as too old to take on the role of King.
And about the whole Camilla thing
Apart from all the talk about whether Queen Elizabeth II will abdicate, one of the hottest royal topics is whether Camilla Parker Bowles will be known as “Queen” if and when Prince Charles ascends the throne. Traditionally, the King’s spouse is referred to as “Queen.” However, public sentiment isn’t exactly supportive of a “Queen Camilla.” Although in 2005, Prince Charles assured the public Camilla would never be known as “Queen,” (she would instead go by the title “Princess Consort”) he’s since retracted his statement, going as far as deleting it from his official website. Would Queen Elizabeth choose to stir up that hornet’s nest? Our guts tell us no. Although, if you got to know the Duchess of Cornwall, you might actually like her. Find out 15 surprising facts about Camilla Parker Bowles.
Prince Philip’s retirement isn’t a couple-thing
When Prince Philip retired in May, people began to wonder if the Queen would join her husband. In fact, the absence of such a declaration by the Queen would appear to be proof of the opposite. Here’s why Prince Philip has never been referred to as “King Philip.”