12 Reasons Queen Elizabeth II Will Never Give Up the Throne
Elizabeth II became the Queen of England in 1952, and if anyone's taking bets on if and when she might abdicate the throne to Prince Charles (or Prince William, if Prince Charles were unavailable to serve), we're all in with: No, and never. Here's why.
Recently, The Daily Mail floated a titillating headline asking, “Is the Queen Preparing to Abdicate?” As it turns out, the story was really about rumors the Queen plans to appoint Prince Charles as “Prince Regent.” However, British history makes clear that appointing a regent is not equal to abdicating. Further, the Queen isn’t even legally empowered to appoint a regent, which happens only under very specific circumstances as outlined in the Regency Act of 1937.
Abdicating due to age just isn’t done
While some royal families have a tradition of monarchs stepping down after he or she reaches a certain age (such as the royal family of the Netherlands), there’s no such tradition in the United Kingdom. In fact, abdication has been said to go against informal rules of the monarchy’s set-up. Indeed, it was considered a constitutional crisis when Prince Edward VIII abdicated in 1936 to marry Wallis Simpson.
Queen Elizabeth II promised she’d reign for life
On her 21st birthday, Queen Elizabeth II promised England she’d be their Queen for life. “I declare before you all that my whole life whether it be long or short shall be devoted to your service and the service of our great imperial family to which we all belong,” she said. That’s a big promise, but she’s kept to it for 69 years now.
She feels it’s her duty to reign
Experts on the monarch such as Sarah Bradford, author of Queen Elizabeth II: Her Life in Our Times, confirm the Queen feels that reigning is her life’s mission and duty. “She’s never even contemplated abdication,” Bradford told The Week. Here are some myths about the royal family that it’s time to stop believing.
The people don’t want her to abdicate
A long time ago, the people might have supported the Queen’s abdicating. That was back before Prince Charles and Princess Diana’s marriage imploded for all to see, says The Week. “It wasn’t until the end of the 1990s that the Prince’s reputation began to pull out of its nosedive.” However, public support of the Queen turning the throne over to the Prince of Wales has not risen significantly. Recent surveys show that a full 70 percent of the United Kingdom would prefer the Queen remain in power for as long as she lives.
The public’s love for the Queen does not equal the public’s love for the monarchy. So while the public would like to see Queen Elizabeth II remain Queen for her lifetime, they may not necessarily wish to replace her with another monarch. As The Guardian’s Polly Toynbee writes, “Let [Queen Elizabeth II] reign as long as she lives. But let her be Elizabeth the Last.” It is hard to imagine the Queen would hand the reins over amid such sentiment. Here are some fascinating facts about the Queen you won’t want to miss.
The whole Charles thing
Even if the public were in favor of putting a new monarch on the throne, Prince Charles is next in line, and that’s considered problematic. “We know far too much about his foibles and past errors to revere him as we revere his mother,” writes The Daily Mail‘s Allison Pearson. In addition, people have their doubts about the ability of Prince Charles to maintain the requisite royal neutrality on certain political issues. While the Queen could abdicate in favor of Prince William, there is no historical precedent for passing over the current Prince of Wales (the traditional “on-deck” role) in favor of his child. Take a look at these candid, rarely seen photos of the royal family.
Plus, Charles is already over 70
Even if the Queen was to abdicate due to her age, the Prince of Wales is already in his 70s. And in the opinion of some palace insiders, including Paul Burrell, former butler of Princess Diana, the public perceives Prince Charles as too old to take on the role of King.
And the whole Camilla thing
Apart from all the talk about whether Queen Elizabeth II will abdicate, one of the hottest royal topics is whether Camilla Parker Bowles will be known as “Queen” if and when Prince Charles ascends the throne. Traditionally, the King’s spouse is referred to as “Queen.” However, public sentiment isn’t exactly supportive of a “Queen Camilla.” Although in 2005, Prince Charles assured the public Camilla would never be known as “Queen,” (she would instead go by the title “Princess Consort”) he’s since retracted his statement, going as far as deleting it from his official website. Would Queen Elizabeth choose to stir up that hornet’s nest? Our guts tell us no. Although, if you got to know the Duchess of Cornwall, you might actually like her. Find out 15 surprising facts about Camilla Parker Bowles.
The royal duties are transitioning to the younger generation
After the late Prince Philip retired from his duties (including public events) in 2017, the Queen was accompanied at many public events by her son and grandsons. With the Queen in her late 90s and the recent passing of Prince Philip, it’s likely that more and more of the public events will be attended only either by Prince Charles, or the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge (Prince William and Kate Middleton).
She’s already delegating anyway
The Queen has lately been delegating more and more of her duties to her children and grandchildren. In doing so, she’s demonstrating her capacity to rule, as well as her effectiveness. Why would the Queen take the much more extreme step of abdicating if she’s able to take the smaller steps of delegating her duties to the younger royals?
Plans are already underway for her NOT to abdicate
The government has already performed a dress rehearsal for the Queen’s death, according to the Express (she is over 90!). “Ministers practiced the ground-breaking protocol for the very first time and even gave it the code name London Bridge,” and the first day after the Queen’s death has been given the code name D1. It certainly doesn’t sound like there are any plans afoot for the Queen not to be Queen at the time of her passing. In fact, it seems that quite the opposite is true. Next, don’t miss these 50 things you didn’t know about the royals.
- The Daily Mail: “Charles the Prince Regent?”
- Royal.uk: “Queen Charlotte”
- Legislation.gov.uk: “Regency Act 1937”
- Royal.uk: “21st Birthday Speech”
- The Week: “Will Prince Charles be King?”
- The Guardian: “Let Queen Elizabeth reign until the end”
- The Daily Mail: “Charles 65th Birthday”
- NowToLove.com.au: “Charles Will Never Be King”
- Express.co.uk: “The Queen Could Step Down”